ArticleiScience2021
Elucidating the interactions between the rust
Article in iScience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Potential ofBiology · 2026Review
- Hidden diversity behind the Lecanicillium-like white colony-forming mycoparasites onPersoonia · 2025Article
- Cloning and expression of theFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Mycodiversity in a micro-habitat: twelveFungal systematics and evolution · 2024Article
- Survey of potential fungal antagonists of Coffee Leaf Rust (Hemileia vastatrix) on Coffea arabica in Hawai'i, USA.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024Article
- High-Density Chitosan Induces a Biochemical and Molecular Response inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Surveying potentially antagonistic fungi to myrtle rust (Austropuccinia psidii) in Brazil: fungicolous Cladosporium spp.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2023Article
- Assessing the Biocontrol Potential ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Influence of pre-and post-harvest factors on the organoleptic and physicochemical quality of coffee: a short review.Journal of food science and technology · 2022Review
- Comprehensive Review of Fungi on Coffee.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Plant pathogens as introduced weed biological control agents: Could antagonistic fungi be important factors determining agent success or failure?Frontiers in fungal biology · 2022Review
- Evaluation of the Physicochemical Properties of Chitosans in Inducing the Defense Response ofPolymers · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.