Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33870007›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.)2021

Environmental hazards, social inequality, and fetal loss: Implications of live-birth bias for estimation of disparities in birth outcomes.

Dana E Goin, Joan A Casey, Marianthi-Anna Kioumourtzoglou, Lara J Cushing, Rachel Morello-Frosch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Association of PMPaediatric and perinatal epidemiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Hurricane Harvey and the risk of spontaneous preterm and early-term birth.Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2024
    Article
  10. Water Fluoridation and Birth Outcomes in California.Environmental health perspectives · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Maternal tobacco smoking and offspring autism spectrum disorder or traits in ECHO cohorts.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Exposure toEnvironmental health perspectives · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Dana E GoinProgram on Reproductive Health and the Environment, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California.
Joan A CaseyDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York.
Marianthi-Anna KioumourtzoglouDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York.
Lara J CushingDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California.
Rachel Morello-FroschDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, & Management and School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
Columbia University · USUCLA Health · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

True Metal fac coreP30ES009089 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MATTHEW S PERZANOWSKI · 1998 to 2026
$44.7M
The Illinois Kids Development Study ECHO Pregnancy and Pediatric CohortUH3OD023272 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI Andrea Aguiar, Susan L Schantz · 2018 to 2026
$18.6M
The Illinois Kids Development Study ECHO Pregnancy and Pediatric CohortUG3OD023272 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI SCHANTZ, SUSAN L · 2016 to 2024
$7.2M
Air Pollution and Pregnancy LossR01ES029943 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DEYSSENROTH, MAYA ARIANE, KIOUMOURTZOGLOU, MARIANTHI-ANNA · 2020 to 2024
$2.5M
The Impact of Unconventional Natural Gas Development on Maternal, Perinatal, and Childhood Health: an Electronic Health Record ApproachR00ES027023 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CASEY, JOAN A · 2019 to 2021
$747k
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES009089NIEHS NIH HHS R00 ES027023NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES029943NIH HHS UG3 OD023272NIH HHS UH3 OD023272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Restricting to live births can induce bias in studies of pregnancy and developmental outcomes, but whether this live-birth bias results in underestimating disparities is unknown. Bias may arise from collider stratification due to an unmeasured common cause of fetal loss and the outcome of interest, or depletion of susceptibles, where exposure differentially causes fetal loss among those with underlying susceptibility.

methodsWe conducted a simulation study to examine the magnitude of live-birth bias in a population parameterized to resemble one year of conceptions in California (N = 625,000). We simulated exposure to a non-time-varying environmental hazard, risk of spontaneous abortion, and time to live birth using 1000 Monte Carlo simulations. Our outcome of interest was preterm birth. We included a social vulnerability factor to represent social disadvantage, and estimated overall risk differences for exposure and preterm birth using linear probability models and stratified by the social vulnerability factor. We calculated how often confidence intervals included the true point estimate (CI coverage probabilities) to illustrate whether effect estimates differed qualitatively from the truth.

resultsDepletion of susceptibles resulted in a larger magnitude of bias compared with collider stratification, with larger bias among the socially vulnerable group. Coverage probabilities were not adversely affected by bias due to collider stratification. Depletion of susceptibles reduced coverage, especially among the socially vulnerable (coverage among socially vulnerable = 46%, coverage among nonsocially vulnerable = 91% in the most extreme scenario).

conclusionsIn simulations, hazardous environmental exposures induced live-birth bias and the bias was larger for socially vulnerable women.

Indexed as

Environmental hazardfetal losshealth disparitieslive-birth biasmiscarriageperinatal healthpreterm birthselection biasspontaneous abortion

Identifiers

PMID33870007
PMCPMC8043739
OpenAlexW3134224667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.