ArticleACS omega2021
Valorization of Bark from Short Rotation Trees by Temperature-Programmed Slow Pyrolysis.
Article in ACS omega, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modeling Bark Thickness and Bark Biomass on Stems of Four Broadleaved Tree Species.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Pyroligneous Acids of Differently Pretreated Hybrid Aspen Biomass: Herbicide and Fungicide Performance.Frontiers in chemistry · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The tree bark represents an abundant but currently underutilized forest biomass side stream. In this work, temperature-programmed slow pyrolysis with fractional condensation was used for thermochemical conversion of the bark obtained from three short rotation tree species, aspen, goat willow, and rowan. Heating was performed in three stages, drying (135 °C), torrefaction (275 °C), and pyrolysis (350 °C), and the resulting vapors were condensed at 120, 70, and 5 °C, producing nine liquid fractions. An additional fraction was collected in the pyrolysis stage at 0 °C. The obtained liquid fractions were characterized in terms of their yields and bulk chemistry (i.e., CHNOS content, water content, pH, and total acid number) as well as their molecular level chemistry by high-resolution mass spectrometry. The highest liquid yields were obtained for the fractions condensed at 70 °C. The water content varied considerably, being the highest for the drying fractions (>96%) and the lowest for the pyrolysis fractions obtained at 120 °C (0.1-2%). Considerable compositional differences were observed between the liquid fractions. While the drying fractions contained mostly some dissolved phenolics, the torrefaction fractions contained more sugaric compounds. In contrast, the pyrolysis fractions were enriched lipids (e.g., suberinic fatty acids and their derivatives) and alicyclic/aromatic hydrocarbons. These fractions could be further refined into different platforms and/or specialty chemicals. Thus, slow pyrolysis with fractional condensation offers a potential route for the valorization of tree bark residues from forest industry.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.