Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33869735›Full record

ReviewEndoscopy international open2021

Sessile serrated lesion detection rates during average risk screening colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature.

Madhav Desai, Joseph C Anderson, Michael Kaminski, Viveksandeep Thoguluva Chandrasekar, Jihan Fathallah, Cesare Hassan, David Lieberman, Prateek Sharma

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Endoscopy international open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Quality indicators for colonoscopy.Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Management of Colorectal Sessile Serrated Lesions in Elderly Patients.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Madhav DesaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri, United States.
Joseph C AndersonDepartment of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont, United States.
Michael KaminskiDepartment of Gastroenterological Oncology, the Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Viveksandeep Thoguluva ChandrasekarDepartment of Gastroenterology and hepatology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States.
Jihan FathallahDepartment of Gastroenterology and hepatology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States.
Cesare HassanEndoscopy Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy.
David LiebermanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States.
Prateek SharmaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri, United States.
Kansas City VA Medical Center · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · USOregon Health & Science University · USOspedale Regina Margherita · ITPostgraduate School of Molecular Medicine · PLWhite River Junction VA Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID33869735
PMCPMC8043815
OpenAlexW3155680410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.