Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33869724›Full record

ArticleAddictive behaviors reports2021

Incentive sensitization in binge behaviors: A mini review on electrophysiological evidence.

Dustin Werle, Philipp A Schroeder, Ines Wolz, Jennifer Svaldi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive behaviors reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dustin WerleUniversity of Tuebingen, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Schleichstrasse 4, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Philipp A SchroederUniversity of Tuebingen, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Schleichstrasse 4, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Ines WolzUniversity of Tuebingen, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Schleichstrasse 4, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Jennifer SvaldiUniversity of Tuebingen, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Schleichstrasse 4, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBinge behavior not only refers to the consumption of substances such as alcohol or food, but is also used in relation to gaming, watching and gambling. Dependent on context it makes for a widespread, benign recreational activity or can pose a serious mental health problem with deleterious consequences. Incentive sensitization theory describes the attribution of salience towards stimuli strongly associated with dopamine-mediated reward as a result of repeated consumption. The sensitized neural networks cause cue-triggered craving and excessive desire, but thus, this mechanism may also be applicable to stimulus-induced behaviors not associated with classical withdrawal symptoms. Event-related potentials (ERP) are a useful method of examining motivated attention towards incentive stimuli. This mini review aims to synthesize ERP findings from different types of binge behaviors in order to compare cue-reactivity to incentive stimuli.

methodsStudies investigating binge drinking, binge eating as well as binge watching, gaming and gambling were screened. To limit the influence of concurrent task demands, ERP studies applying picture viewing paradigms with incentive stimuli were selected.

resultsAcross binge behaviors, evidence on altered mid-latency ERPs has been mixed. However, studies investigating later stages of attentional processes more consistently find enlarged P300 and late positive potentials (LPP) amplitudes to relevant cues.

conclusionAn altered attentional processing of incentive stimuli reflecting motivated attention is in line with incentive sensitization theory. Considering the limited number of studies, especially regarding binge behaviors not involving substances, more research is needed to attain a more thorough understanding of incentive sensitization across binge behaviors.

Indexed as

BED, binge eating disorderBinge behaviorsBN, bulimia nervosaEEG, electroencephalographyEPN, early posterior negativityERP, event-related potentialEvent-related potentialsIGD, internet gaming disorderIncentive sensitizationLPP, late positive potentialsMotivated attentionOCD, obsessive compulsive disorderPicture viewing

Identifiers

PMID33869724
PMCPMC8040100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.