ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2021
Changes in sleep parameters following biomimetic oral appliance therapy: A case report.
Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Berlin and Epworth Surveys to Predict Obstructive Sleep Apnea for Adults on Biomimetic Oral Appliance Therapy: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.International journal of dentistry · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMandibular advancement devices (MADs) are used to treat mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), but there is a risk that the underlying condition can worsen in the long-term. Therefore, this case report is based on biomimetic oral appliance therapy as an alternative to MADs, which was found to be beneficial in the treatment of a case with severe OSA. CASE SUMMARY: An overnight sleep study was undertaken in a 50-year-old male with excessive daytime sleepiness that lead to a diagnosis of severe OSA as the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was found to be 32.8/h. Since the patient was unable to comply with continuous positive airway pressure therapy and declined surgical intervention, treatment with a MAD was initiated. Approximately 10 years later, another sleep study was performed with no MAD in the mouth, which revealed an AHI of 67.9/h. In view of the deterioration in sleep quality, the patient sought alternative treatment and elected on biomimetic oral appliance therapy, using a mandibular repositioning nighttime appliance (mRNA appliance
conclusionIn adults with severe OSA that are unable to accept continuous positive airway pressure or surgical treatment, biomimetic oral appliance therapy may be preferable over MADs since biomimetic oral appliance therapy may be able to prevent worsening of sleep parameters by remodeling the nasomaxillary complex. Long-term follow up studies are required to verify these novel findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.