Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33869532›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in sociology2020

Citizen Science, Education, and Learning: Challenges and Opportunities.

Joseph Roche, Laura Bell, Cecília Galvão, Yaela N Golumbic, Laure Kloetzer, Nieke Knoben, Mari Laakso, Julia Lorke, Greg Mannion, Luciano Massetti and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in sociology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Citizen Science Studies in Nursing: A Systematic Review.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Joseph RocheTrinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Laura BellTrinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Cecília GalvãoUniversity of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Yaela N GolumbicUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Laure KloetzerUniversity of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Nieke KnobenNaturalis Biodiversity Centre, Leiden, Netherlands.
Mari LaaksoMinistry of Agriculture and Forestry, Helsinki, Finland.
Julia LorkeWissenschaft im Dialog, Bürger Schaffen Wissen, Berlin, Germany.
Greg MannionUniversity of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom.
Luciano MassettiInstitute of Bioeconomy, Italian National Research Council, Rome, Italy.
Alice MauchlineUniversity of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom.
Kai PataTallinn University, Tallinn, Estonia.
Andy RuckUniversity of the Highlands and Islands, Perth, United Kingdom.
Pavel TarabaTomas Bata University in Zlín, Zlín, Czechia.
Silvia WinterVienna University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Citizen science is a growing field of research and practice, generating new knowledge and understanding through the collaboration of citizens in scientific research. As the field expands, it is becoming increasingly important to consider its potential to foster education and learning opportunities. Although progress has been made to support learning in citizen science projects, as well as to facilitate citizen science in formal and informal learning environments, challenges still arise. This paper identifies a number of dilemmas facing the field-from competing scientific goals and learning outcomes, differing underlying ontologies and epistemologies, diverging communication strategies, to clashing values around advocacy and activism. Although such challenges can become barriers to the successful integration of citizen science into mainstream education systems, they also serve as signposts for possible synergies and opportunities. One of the key emerging recommendations is to align educational learning outcomes with citizen science project goals at the planning stage of the project using co-creation approaches to ensure issues of accessibility and inclusivity are paramount throughout the design and implementation of every project. Only then can citizen science realise its true potential to empower citizens to take ownership of their own science education and learning.

Indexed as

activismlearning environmentsontology and epistemologypublic engagementscience communicationteachers

Identifiers

PMID33869532
PMCPMC8022735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.