Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33869500›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sociology2020

COVID-19: Technology, Social Connections, Loneliness, and Leisure Activities: An International Study Protocol.

Hannah R Marston, Loredana Ivan, Mireia Fernández-Ardèvol, Andrea Rosales Climent, Madelin Gómez-León, Daniel Blanche-T, Sarah Earle, Pei-Chun Ko, Sophie Colas, Burcu Bilir and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Age and Gender Perspectives on Social Media and Technology Practices during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Mental Health and Access to Information in Times of COVID-19: The Role of Social Work.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Hannah R MarstonHealth and Wellbeing Strategic Research Area, The Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom.
Loredana IvanCommunication Department, The National University of Political Studies and Public Administration (SNSPA), Bucharest, Romania.
Mireia Fernández-ArdèvolCommunication Networks & Social Change (CNSC) Research Group, Internet Interdisciplinary Institute (IN3) Research Institute, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Catalonia, Spain.
Andrea Rosales ClimentCommunication Networks & Social Change (CNSC) Research Group, Internet Interdisciplinary Institute (IN3) Research Institute, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Catalonia, Spain.
Madelin Gómez-LeónCommunication Networks & Social Change (CNSC) Research Group, Internet Interdisciplinary Institute (IN3) Research Institute, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Catalonia, Spain.
Daniel Blanche-TCommunication Networks & Social Change (CNSC) Research Group, Internet Interdisciplinary Institute (IN3) Research Institute, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Catalonia, Spain.
Sarah EarleHealth and Wellbeing Strategic Research Area, The Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom.
Pei-Chun KoCentre for University Core, Singapore University of Social Science, Singapore, Singapore.
Sophie ColasLe Centre de Recherches Individus, Épreuves, Sociétés (CeRIES), University of Lille, Lille, France.
Burcu BilirGraduate School of Educational Sciences, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Canakkale, Turkey.
Halime Öztürk ÇalikogluGraduate School of Educational Sciences, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Canakkale, Turkey.
Hasan ArslanGraduate School of Educational Sciences, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Canakkale, Turkey.
Rubal KanoziaDepartment of Mass Communication and Media Studies, Central University of Punjab, Bathinda, India.
Ulla KrieberneggAge and Care Research Group Graz, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Franziska GroßschädlInstitute of Nursing Science and Age and Care Research Group, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Felix ReerDepartment of Communication, University of Munster, Munster, Germany.
Thorsten QuandtDepartment of Communication, University of Munster, Munster, Germany.
Sandra C ButtigiegDepartment of Health Sciences Management, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.
Paula Alexandra SilvaDepartment of Informatics Engineering (DEI), Centre for Informatics and Systems (CISUC), Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Vera GallistlAgeing, Generations, Life-Course Research Group, Department of Sociology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Rebekka RohnerAgeing, Generations, Life-Course Research Group, Department of Sociology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drawn from the stress process model, the pandemic has imposed substantial stress to individual economic and mental well-being and has brought unprecedented disruptions to social life. In light of social distancing measures, and in particular physical distancing because of lockdown policies, the use of digital technologies has been regarded as the alternative to maintain economic and social activities. This paper aims to describe the design and implementation of an online survey created as an urgent, international response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The online survey described here responds to the need of understanding the effects of the pandemic on social interactions/relations and to provide findings on the extent to which digital technology is being utilized by citizens across different communities and countries around the world. It also aims to analyze the association of use of digital technologies with psychological well-being and levels of loneliness. The data will be based on the ongoing survey (comprised of several existing and validated instruments on digital use, psychological well-being and loneliness), open for 3 months after roll out (ends September) across 11 countries (Austria, France, Germany, India, Malta, Portugal, Romania, Spain, Turkey, and UK). Participants include residents aged 18 years and older in the countries and snowball sampling is employed via social media platforms. We anticipate that the findings of the survey will provide useful and much needed information on the prevalence of use and intensities of digital technologies among different age groups, gender, socioeconomic groups in a comparative perspective. Moreover, we expect that the future analysis of the data collected will show that different types of digital technologies and intensities of use are associated with psychological well-being and loneliness. To conclude, these findings from the study are expected to bring in our understanding the role of digital technologies in affecting individual social and emotional connections during a crisis.

Indexed as

gerontechnologygerontologyinternational rapid responsepandemic (COVID-19)quantitative datasocial mediasocial science research

Identifiers

PMID33869500
PMCPMC8022752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.