Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33869416›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sociology2020

Moral and Contextual Dimensions of "Inappropriate" Antibiotic Prescribing in Secondary Care: A Three-Country Interview Study.

Carolyn Tarrant, Eva M Krockow, W M I Dilini Nakkawita, Michele Bolscher, Andrew M Colman, Edmund Chattoe-Brown, Nelun Perera, Shaheen Mehtar, David R Jenkins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Role of locum GPs in antibiotic prescribing and stewardship: a mixed-methods study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Carolyn TarrantDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Eva M KrockowDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
W M I Dilini NakkawitaFaculty of Medicine, General Sir John Kotelawala Defence University, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Michele BolscherTygerberg Academic Hospital and Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Andrew M ColmanDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Edmund Chattoe-BrownSchool of Media, Communication and Sociology, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Nelun PereraDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Shaheen MehtarTygerberg Academic Hospital and Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
David R JenkinsDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Overuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics in secondary care is a key contributor to the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR); efforts are focused on minimizing antibiotic overuse as a crucial step toward containing the global threat of AMR. The concept of overtreatment has, however, been difficult to define. Efforts to address the overuse of medicine need to be informed by an understanding of how prescribers themselves understand the problem. We report findings from a qualitative interview study of 46 acute care hospital prescribers differing in seniority from three countries: United Kingdom, Sri Lanka and South Africa. Prescribers were asked about their understanding of inappropriate use of antibiotics. Prescriber definitions of inappropriate use included relatively clear-cut and unambiguous cases of antibiotics being used "incorrectly" (e.g., in the case of viral infections). In many cases, however, antibiotic prescribing decisions were seen as involving uncertainty, with prescribers having to make decisions about the threshold for appropriate use. Decisions about thresholds were commonly framed in moral terms. Some prescribers drew on arguments about their duty to protect public health through having a high threshold for prescribing, while others made strong arguments for prioritizing risk avoidance for the patients in front of them, even at a cost of increased resistance. Notions of whether prescribing was inappropriate were also contextually dependent: high levels of antibiotic prescribing could be seen as a rational response when prescribers were working in challenging contexts, and could be justified in relation to financial and social considerations. Inappropriate antibiotic use is framed by prescribers not just in clinical, but also in moral and contextual terms; this has implications for the design and implementation of antibiotic stewardship interventions aiming to reduce inappropriate use of antibiotics globally.

Indexed as

antibiotic prescribingantimicrobial resistancehospitalinternationalqualitative investigation

Identifiers

PMID33869416
PMCPMC8022648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.