Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33869376›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in sociology2019

The Genome-Wide Study of Human Social Behavior and Its Application in Sociology.

Peter T Tanksley, Ryan T Motz, Rachel M Kail, J C Barnes, Hexuan Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in sociology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Peter T TanksleySchool of Criminal Justice, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Ryan T MotzSchool of Criminal Justice, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Rachel M KailSchool of Criminal Justice, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
J C BarnesSchool of Criminal Justice, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Hexuan LiuSchool of Criminal Justice, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent years have seen a push for the integration of modern genomic methodologies with sociological inquiry. The inclusion of genomic approaches promises to help address long-standing issues in sociology (e.g., selection effects), as well as open up new avenues for future research. This article reviews the substantive findings of behavior genetic/genomic research, both from the recent past (e.g., twin/adoption studies, candidate gene studies) and from contemporary genomic analyses. The article primarily focuses on modern genomic methods available to sociologists (e.g., polygenic score analysis) and their various applications for answering sociological questions. The article concludes by considering a number of areas to which genomic researchers and sociologists should pay close attention if a consilience between genomic methods and sociological research is to be fully realized.

Indexed as

candidate genesgene-environment correlationgene-environment interactiongenome-wide associationheritabilitypolygenic scoressocial science genomicssociogenomics

Identifiers

PMID33869376
PMCPMC8022812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.