Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33868911›Full record

ArticleGlobal food security2021

The Processed food revolution in African food systems and the Double Burden of Malnutrition.

Thomas Reardon, David Tschirley, Lenis Saweda O Liverpool-Tasie, Titus Awokuse, Jessica Fanzo, Bart Minten, Rob Vos, Michael Dolislager, Christine Sauer, Rahul Dhar and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global food security, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
16.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 283 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas ReardonDepartment of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
David TschirleyDepartment of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Lenis Saweda O Liverpool-TasieDepartment of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Titus AwokuseDepartment of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Jessica FanzoNitze School of Advanced International Studies and the Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Bart MintenInternational Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC 20005, USA.
Rob VosInternational Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC 20005, USA.
Michael DolislagerDepartment of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Christine SauerDepartment of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Rahul DharDepartment of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Carolina VargasDepartment of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Anna LarteyNutrition and Food Systems Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, USA.
Ahmed RazaNutrition and Food Systems Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, USA.
Barry M PopkinDepartment of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health and the Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.
Michigan State University · USInternational Food Policy Research Institute · USUnited Nations · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

African consumers have purchased increasing amounts of processed food over the past 50 years. The opportunity cost of time of women and men has increased as more of them work outside the home, driving them to buy processed food and food prepared away from home to save arduous home-processing and preparation labor. In the past several decades, this trend has accelerated with a surge on the supply side of the processing sector and small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and large private companies making massive aggregate investments. Packaged, industrialized, ultra-processed foods and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) are a growing proportion of the processed food consumed. Also, in the past several decades, overweight and obesity have joined the long-standing high levels of stunting and wasting among children and extreme thinness among women of childbearing age. Together these phenomena have formed a double burden of malnutrition (DBM). The DBM has emerged as an important health problem in sub-Saharan Africa. The rise of the DBM and the increase in ultra-processed food consumption are linked. Policy makers face a dilemma. On the one hand, purchases of processed food are driven by long-term factors, such as urbanization, increased income, and employment changes, and thus policy cannot change the pursuit of convenience and labor-saving food. Moreover, much processed food, like packaged milk, is a boon to nutrition, and the processed food system is a major source of jobs for women. On the other hand, the portion (some 10-30%) of processed food that is ultra-processed is a public health challenge, and policy must address its detrimental effects on disease burden. The global experience suggests that double duty actions are most important as are selected policies focused on healthy weaning foods for addressing stunting and taxes on SSBs, nutrition labeling, and other measures can steer consumers away from unhealthy ultra-processed foods to addressing obesity and possibly child nutrition and stunting. We recommend that African governments consider these policy options, but note that the current extreme fragmentation of the processing sector, consisting of vast numbers of informal SMEs in sub-Saharan Africa, and the limited administrative/implementation capacity of many African governments require pursuing this path only gradually.

Indexed as

Africadouble burden of malnutritiondouble duty actionsfood away from homefood consumptionfood processingfood systemobesitysmall and medium enterprisesstuntingultra-processed foodweaning foods

Identifiers

PMID33868911
PMCPMC8049356
OpenAlexW3110228004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.