ReviewIn silico pharmacology2021
Topoisomerase II as a target for repurposed antibiotics in
Review in In silico pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chemical screening of Hibiscus rosa-sinensis for their phytochemicals and their in vitro/in silico evaluation as α-amylase inhibitors.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Synthesis (ACS omega · 2022Article
- Molecular docking analysis of lupeol with different cancer targets.Bioinformation · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fluoroquinolines, the widely used antibacterial antibiotics, have been shown to interact with human DNA topoisomerases supporting their use as repurposed cancer drugs in humans. In this communication molecular docking of eleven Fluoroquinolines against predicted structure of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.