ArticleProceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine2019
Hierarchical Adaptive Multi-task Learning Framework for Patient Diagnoses and Diagnostic Category Classification.
Article in Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal multitask deep learning for grading management system in non-small cell lung cancer.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Personalized event prediction for Electronic Health Records.Artificial intelligence in medicine · 2023Article
- Learning EKG Diagnostic Models with Hierarchical Class Label Dependencies.Artificial intelligence in medicine. Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (2005- ) · 2023Article
- Neural Clinical Event Sequence Prediction through Personalized Online Adaptive Learning.Artificial intelligence in medicine. Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (2005- ) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The problems a patient suffers from can be summarized in terms of a list of patient diagnoses. The diagnoses are typically organized in a hierarchy (or a lattice structure) in which many different low-level diagnoses are covered by one or more diagnostic categories. An interesting machine learning problem is related to learning of a wide range of diagnostic models (at different levels of abstraction) that can automatically assign a diagnosis or a diagnostic category to a specific patient. While one can always approach this problem by learning models for each diagnostic task independently, an interesting open question is how one can leverage the knowledge of a diagnostic hierarchy to improve the classification and outperform independent diagnostic models. In this work, we study this problem by designing a new hierarchical classification learning framework in which multiple diagnostic classification targets are explicitly related via diagnostic hierarchy relations. By conducting experiments on MIMIC-III data and ICD-9 diagnosis hierarchy, we demonstrate that our framework leads to improved classification performance on individual diagnostic tasks when compared to independently learned diagnostic models. This improvement is stronger for diagnoses with a low prior and smaller number of positive training examples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.