ArticleJournal of ophthalmology2021
Visual Sequelae of Computer Vision Syndrome: A Cross-Sectional Case-Control Study.
Article in Journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06106347 (Analysis of Visual and Ocular Outcomes of Computer Vision Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Analysis of Visual and Ocular Outcomes of Computer Vision Syndrome
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of computer vision syndrome during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2024Pooled it
- Prevalence of computer vision syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of optometryPooled it
- Digital Eye Strain from Digital Device Usage Among University Students: Prevalence and Associated Factors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Digital Eye Strain: Updated Perspectives.Clinical optometry · 2024Review
- Visual, ocular surface, and extraocular diagnostic criteria for determining the prevalence of computer vision syndrome: a cross-sectional smart-survey-based study.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2024Article
- Response to the Letter to the Editor Regarding "Blue Light Exposure: Ocular Hazards and Prevention-A Narrative Review" by Iqbal et al.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2023Article
- Letter to the Editor Regarding "Blue Light Exposure: Ocular Hazards and Prevention-A Narrative Review".Ophthalmology and therapy · 2023Article
- A study on correlation of computer vision syndrome and dry eye disease and knowledge regarding its associated factors amongst health professionals.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Computer Vision Syndrome: An Ophthalmic Pathology of the Modern Era.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Analysis of the Outcomes of the Screen-Time Reduction in Computer Vision Syndrome: A Cohort Comparative Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
- Analysis of the Outcomes of the Screen-Time Reduction in Computer Vision Syndrome: A Cohort Comparative Study [Letter].Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
- Analysis of the Outcomes of the Screen-Time Reduction in Computer Vision Syndrome: A Cohort Comparative Study [Response to Letter].Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
- Tweenager Computer Visual Syndrome Due to Tablets and Laptops during the Postlockdown COVID-19 Pandemic and the Influence on the Binocular and Accommodative System.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Letter to the Editor: "Self-Reported Student Awareness and Prevalence of Computer Vision Syndrome During COVID-19 Pandemic at Al-Baha University" [Letter].Clinical optometry · 2022Article
- Computer vision syndrome and its determinants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.SAGE open medicine · 2022Review
- Computer Visual Syndrome in Medical Students From a Private University in Paraguay: A Survey Study.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Improvement of Presbyopia Using a Mixture of Traditional Chinese Herbal Medicines, Including Cassiae Semen, Wolfberry, andEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021Article
- Ocular and musculoskeletal changes in the pediatric population using gadgets.Romanian journal of ophthalmologyObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the visual, ocular, extraocular, and multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) outcomes of computer vision syndrome (CVS) among medical students.
methodsThis study was designed as a cross-sectional case-control study that included 733 medical students. All students completed a specially designed and validated CVS questionnaire survey (CVS-F3). Students from the control (No-CVS) and CVS groups underwent comprehensive ophthalmic examinations including the mfERG examinations. Our main outcome measures included uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA and CDVA, resp.) measurements, subjective and cycloplegic refractions, slit-lamp examination, intraocular pressure measurement, pupillary reflexes tests, ocular movements' tests, dry eye disease tests, and fundus and mfERG examinations.
resultsThe CVS-F3 identified that 87.9% of students had complaints that might be related to CVS. We documented a 76% prevalence rate in students undergoing an ophthalmologic exam. The most common ocular and extraocular complaints included visual blur and headache (40.9% and 46.8%, resp.). Statistical logistic and linear regression analyses showed that refractive errors, prolonged screen-hours, close eye-screen distance, improper gaze angle, poor screen-resolution, and screen-glare were risk factors for developing CVS and influencing its severity. In the mfERG subgroup, 42.5% demonstrated reduced amplitudes of mfERG rings and quadrants, indicating reduced foveal responses.
conclusionSurveys cannot yield an accurate CVS prevalence. However, they help to identify subjects at risk who should be comprehensively assessed to confirm or exclude CVS diagnosis. Smartphone misuse primarily caused CVS among users. Our mfERG findings might be a sign of potential CVS visual sequelae; however, future studies are warranted. Clinicians need to understand these sequelae to appropriately identify and treat CVS.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.