Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33868709›Full record

ArticleEvolution letters2021

Regional differences in rapid evolution during severe drought.

Daniel N Anstett, Haley A Branch, Amy L Angert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution letters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Evolution shapes ecosystem resilience through spatial self-organization.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Evolution of flowering phenology over 44 years of climate change.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Investigating Genetic Spillage in aEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Local adaptation: Causal agents of selection and adaptive trait divergence.Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel N AnstettBiodiversity Research Centre and Department of Botany University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia V6T 1Z4 Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7552-5539
Haley A BranchBiodiversity Research Centre and Department of Botany University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia V6T 1Z4 Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0886-1836
Amy L AngertBiodiversity Research Centre and Department of Botany University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia V6T 1Z4 Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3082-0133

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change is increasing drought intensity, threatening biodiversity. Rapid evolution of drought adaptations might be required for population persistence, particularly in rear-edge populations that may already be closer to physiological limits. Resurrection studies are a useful tool to assess adaptation to climate change, yet these studies rarely encompass the geographic range of a species. Here, we sampled 11 populations of scarlet monkeyflower (

Indexed as

Adaptationclimate changedehydration avoidancedehydration escapeErythranthe cardinalisflowering timeplasticityresurrection studyspecific leaf area

Identifiers

PMID33868709
PMCPMC8045920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.