Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33868690›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of kidney health and disease2021

Kidney Check Point-of-Care Testing-Furthering Patient Engagement and Patient-Centered Care in Canada's Rural and Remote Indigenous Communities: Program Report.

Sarah Curtis, Heather Martin, Michelle DiNella, Barry Lavallee, Caroline Chartrand, Lorraine McLeod, Cathy Woods, Allison Dart, Navdeep Tangri, Claudio Rigatto and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of kidney health and disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03595267 (Optimal Approaches to Chronic Kidney Disease Case Finding in Indigenous Communities), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03595267 recruitingnot on this map

Optimal Approaches to Chronic Kidney Disease Case Finding in Indigenous Communities

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of ManitobaRan2019 to 2025Enrolled2,500ConditionsChronic Kidney Disease, Diabetes, HypertensionArmsPoint-of-care screening
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah CurtisChronic Disease Innovation Center, Seven Oaks General Hospital, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2703-1352
Heather MartinChronic Disease Innovation Center, Seven Oaks General Hospital, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Michelle DiNellaChronic Disease Innovation Center, Seven Oaks General Hospital, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Barry LavalleeDiabetes Integration Project, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Caroline ChartrandFirst Nations Health and Social Secretariat of Manitoba, MB, Canada.
Lorraine McLeodDiabetes Integration Project, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Cathy WoodsCan-SOLVE CKD Network, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Allison DartDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, The Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4718-9408
Navdeep TangriChronic Disease Innovation Center, Seven Oaks General Hospital, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Claudio RigattoChronic Disease Innovation Center, Seven Oaks General Hospital, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8306-8072
Paul KomendaChronic Disease Innovation Center, Seven Oaks General Hospital, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Seven Oaks General Hospital · CADiabetes Canada · CAChildren's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba · CAFirst Nations Health and Social Secretariat of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of programAccess to health care services remains a significant barrier for many Indigenous people's living in rural and remote regions of Canada. Driven by geographical isolation and compounded by socioeconomic and environmental disparities, individuals living under these circumstances face disproportionately poor health outcomes. Kidney Check is a comprehensive screening, triage, and treatment initiative working to bring culturally safe preventive care to rural and remote Indigenous communities across Manitoba, Ontario, BC, Alberta, and Saskatchewan. The project's patient-oriented approach addresses concerns raised by kidney patients and their caregivers using culturally safe practices. Using the various expertise of their multidisciplinary team, Kidney Check seeks to further collaborative efforts to improve access to preventive health care for these groups. Meaningful engagement with patients, communities, and local health care stakeholders ensures Indigenous voices are heard and incorporated into the project in a way that promotes shared decision-making and sustainability. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: As an affiliate program of the Can-SOLVE CKD Network, Kidney Check's guiding priorities were developed over 3 years of patient consultation and finalized during 2 workshops held with more than 30 patients, caregivers, Indigenous peoples, researchers, and policy makers using a modified Delphi process. Today, patients continue to participate in project development via 2 governing bodies: The Patient Governance Circle and the Indigenous Peoples Engagement and Research Council (IPERC).

methodsModeled after the Indigenous-led 2015 FINISHED project in Manitoba, Kidney Check employs point-of-care testing to identify diabetes, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) in individuals, ages 10 and above, regardless of pre-existing risk factors. The Kidney Check team consists of 4 working groups: project leadership, provincial management, local community partners, and patient partners. By using and building on existing relationships between local and provincial health care stakeholders and various Indigenous communities, the program furthers collaborative efforts to bridge gaps in health equity. KEY

findingsThe Kidney Check program has established an infrastructure that integrates patient engagement at all stages of the program from priority setting to deployment and dissemination strategies. LIMITATIONS: While we encourage and offer screening services to all, many still choose not to attend for a variety of reasons which may introduce selection bias. Kidney Check uses patient engagement as a foundational component of the program; however, there is currently a limited amount of research documenting the benefits of patient engagement in health care settings. More formal qualitative evaluations of these activities are needed. In addition, as the COVID-19 pandemic has halted screening procedures in most communities, we currently do not have quantitative data to support the efficacy of the Kidney Check program. IMPLICATIONS: For many Indigenous people, lack of accessibility to health care services is compounded by sociopolitical barriers that disrupt relationships between patients and providers. Meaningful engagement presents one opportunity to ensure the voices and perspectives of Indigenous patients and communities are incorporated into health services. In addition, this screening paradigm has shown to be cost effective as shown by analyses done on the FINISHED screening program.

Indexed as

chronic kidney disease (CKD)CKD screeningpatient-centered carepatient engagementpatient-oriented research

Identifiers

PMID33868690
PMCPMC8020215
OpenAlexW3147009272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.