Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33868552›Full record

ArticleThe Neurohospitalist2021

Head-to-Head Comparison of Social Network Assessments in Stroke Survivors.

Morgan Prust, Abby Halm, Simona Nedelcu, Amber Nieves, Amar Dhand

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Neurohospitalist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Morgan PrustDepartment of Neurology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1380-3422
Abby HalmDepartment of Neurology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Simona NedelcuDepartment of Neurology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Amber NievesDepartment of Neurology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Amar DhandDepartment of Neurology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

Impact of Social Network Structure on Stroke RecoveryK23HD083489 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DHAND, AMAR · 2015 to 2020
$750k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD083489
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeSocial networks influence human health and disease through direct biological and indirect psychosocial mechanisms. They have particular importance in neurologic disease because of support, information, and healthy behavior adoption that circulate in networks. Investigations into social networks as determinants of disease risk and health outcomes have historically relied on summary indices of social support, such as the Lubben Social Network Scale-Revised (LSNS-R) or the Stroke Social Network Scale (SSNS). We compared these 2 survey tools to personal network (PERSNET) mapping tool, a novel social network survey that facilitates detailed mapping of social network structure, extraction of quantitative network structural parameters, and characterization of the demographic and health parameters of each network member.

methodsIn a cohort of inpatient and outpatient stroke survivors, we administered LSNS-R, SSNS, and PERSNET in a randomized order to each patient. We used logistic regression to generate correlation matrices between LSNS-R scores, SSNS scores, and PERSNET's network structure (eg, size and density) and composition metrics (eg, percent kin in network). We also examined the relationship between LSNS-R-derived risk of social isolation with PERSNET-derived network size.

resultsWe analyzed survey responses for 67 participants and found a significant correlation between LSNS-R, SSNS, and PERSNET-derived indices of network structure. We found no correlation between LSNS-R, SSNS, and PERSNET-derived metrics of network composition. Personal network mapping tool structural and compositional variables were also internally correlated. Social isolation defined by LSNS-R corresponded to a network size of <5.

conclusionsPersonal network mapping tool is a valid index of social network structure, with a significant correlation to validated indices of perceived social support. Personal network mapping tool also captures a novel range of health behavioral data that have not been well characterized by previous network surveys. Therefore, PERSNET offers a comprehensive social network assessment with visualization capabilities that quantifies the social environment in a valid and unique manner.

Indexed as

cerebrovascular disordersnetwork mappingsocial determinants of healthsocial networksstrokestroke recovery

Identifiers

PMID33868552
PMCPMC8022189
OpenAlexW3049457325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.