ArticleBayesian analysis2018
Bayesian Analysis of RNA-Seq Data Using a Family of Negative Binomial Models.
Article in Bayesian analysis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Probabilistic outlier identification for RNA sequencing generalized linear models.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Transcriptomics Signature from Next-Generation Sequencing Data Reveals New Transcriptomic Biomarkers Related to Prostate Cancer.Cancer informatics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The analysis of RNA-Seq data has been focused on three main categories, including gene expression, relative exon usage and transcript expression. Methods have been proposed independently for each category using a negative binomial (NB) model. However, counts following a NB distribution on one feature (e.g., exon) do not guarantee a NB distribution for the other two features (e.g., gene/transcript). In this paper we propose a family of Negative Binomial models, which integrates the gene, exon and transcript analysis under a coherent NB model. The proposed model easily incorporates the uncertainty of assigning reads to transcripts and simplifies substantially the estimation for the relative usage. We developed simple Gibbs sampling algorithms for the posterior inference by exploiting fully tractable closed-forms of computation via suitable conjugate priors. The proposed models were investigated under extensive simulations. Finally, we applied our model to a real data set.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.