ArticleJournal of ambient intelligence and humanized computing2022
EDAS method for decision support modeling under the Pythagorean probabilistic hesitant fuzzy aggregation information.
Article in Journal of ambient intelligence and humanized computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- An integrated neutrosophic Z-numbers based CRITIC-EDAS decision model for smart solar panel evaluation in sustainable energy planning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Novel concept of linguistic fractional fuzzy information for effective water filtration decision-making problem based on WASPAS method.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Development of a triangular Fermatean fuzzy EDAS model for remote patient monitoring applications.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Additive manufacturing process selection for automotive industry using Pythagorean fuzzy CRITIC EDAS.PloS one · 2023Article
- New method for emergency decision making with an integrated regret theory-EDAS method in 2-tuple spherical linguistic environment.Applied intelligence (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2022Article
- Cloud vendor selection for the healthcare industry using a big data-driven decision model with probabilistic linguistic information.Applied intelligence (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2022Article
- Decades on emergency decision-making: a bibliometric analysis and literature review.Complex & intelligent systems · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The significance of emergency decision-making (EmDM) has been experienced recently due to the continuous occurrence of various emergency situations that have caused significant social and monetary misfortunes. EmDM assumes a manageable role when it is important to moderate property and live misfortunes and to reduce the negative effects on the social and natural turn of events. Genuine world EmDM issues are usually described as complex, time-consuming, lack of data, and the effect of mental practices that make it a challenging task for decision-makers. This article shows the need to manage the various types of vulnerabilities and to monitor practices to resolve these concerns. In clinical analysis, how to select an ideal drug from certain drugs with efficacy values for coronavirus disease has become a common problem these days. To address this issue, we are establishing a multi-attribute decision-making approach (MADMap) based on the EDAS method under Pythagorean probabilistic hesitant fuzzy information. In addition, an algorithm is developed to address the uncertainty in the selection of drugs in EmDM issues with regards to clinical analysis. The actual contextual analysis of the selection of the appropriate drug to treat coronavirus ailment is utilized to show the practicality of our proposed technique. Finally, with the help of a comparative analysis of the TOPSIS technique, we demonstrate the efficiency and applicability of the established methodology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.