Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33868508›Full record

ArticleJournal of ambient intelligence and humanized computing2022

EDAS method for decision support modeling under the Pythagorean probabilistic hesitant fuzzy aggregation information.

Bushra Batool, Shougi Suliman Abosuliman, Saleem Abdullah, Shahzaib Ashraf

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ambient intelligence and humanized computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Bushra BatoolDepartment of Mathematics, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-4243-0271
Shougi Suliman AbosulimanDepartment of Transportation and Port Management, Faculty of Maritime Studies, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, 21588 Saudi Arabia.
Saleem AbdullahDepartment of Mathematics, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Mardan, Pakistan.
Shahzaib AshrafDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Bacha Khan University, Charsadda, 24420 KP Pakistan.
Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan · PKBacha Khan University · PKKing Abdulaziz University · SAUniversity of Sargodha · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The significance of emergency decision-making (EmDM) has been experienced recently due to the continuous occurrence of various emergency situations that have caused significant social and monetary misfortunes. EmDM assumes a manageable role when it is important to moderate property and live misfortunes and to reduce the negative effects on the social and natural turn of events. Genuine world EmDM issues are usually described as complex, time-consuming, lack of data, and the effect of mental practices that make it a challenging task for decision-makers. This article shows the need to manage the various types of vulnerabilities and to monitor practices to resolve these concerns. In clinical analysis, how to select an ideal drug from certain drugs with efficacy values for coronavirus disease has become a common problem these days. To address this issue, we are establishing a multi-attribute decision-making approach (MADMap) based on the EDAS method under Pythagorean probabilistic hesitant fuzzy information. In addition, an algorithm is developed to address the uncertainty in the selection of drugs in EmDM issues with regards to clinical analysis. The actual contextual analysis of the selection of the appropriate drug to treat coronavirus ailment is utilized to show the practicality of our proposed technique. Finally, with the help of a comparative analysis of the TOPSIS technique, we demonstrate the efficiency and applicability of the established methodology.

Indexed as

Decision makingPythagorean probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set

Identifiers

PMID33868508
PMCPMC8039808
OpenAlexW3156837811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.