Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33868443›Full record

ReviewEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2021

Acupuncture Treatment for Cough-Variant Asthma: A Meta-Analysis.

Jian Xiong, WenChuan Qi, Han Yang, SiTing Zou, Jing Kong, ChengLong Wang, YuanFang Zhou, FanRong Liang

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Clinical Evidence and Potential Mechanisms of Complementary Treatment ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jian XiongChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 6100752, Sichuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8346-178X
WenChuan QiChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 6100752, Sichuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3294-8870
Han YangChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 6100752, Sichuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3572-5461
SiTing ZouGuangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanning 5300013, Guangxi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0052-1386
Jing KongChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 6100752, Sichuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1691-5638
ChengLong WangThe People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, Guangxi 168600, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2410-3824
YuanFang ZhouChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 6100752, Sichuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2387-9957
FanRong LiangChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 6100752, Sichuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8518-9268
Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNGuangxi University of Chinese Medicine · CNThe People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, there have been many clinical reports on acupuncture treatment of cough-variant asthma, but no researcher has objectively analysed and evaluated the efficacy and safety of acupuncture treatment of cough-variant asthma from the perspective of evidence-based medicine.

objectiveTo systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of acupuncture in treating cough-variant asthma and to provide reference values for clinical decision-making.

methodsThe comprehensive computer retrieval Chinese journal full-text database (CNKI), Chinese science and technology periodical database (VIP), ten thousand data knowledge service platform (WanFang Data), PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were used to collect literature for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCT) of acupuncture treatment of cough-variant asthma, as well as to retrieve papers and add reference retrieval after literature review, in accordance with the standard of literature filtering, data extraction, and quality evaluation. The data were meta-analysed using ReviewManager5.3 software recommended by Cochrane.

resultsA total of 11 randomized controlled clinical studies were screened and included, comprising 929 patients. The results of the meta-analysis showed that, compared with the control group, acupuncture intervention on CVA could enhance the total clinical effectiveness rate, reduce the relapse rate of drug withdrawal, relieve symptoms of cough, phlegm, and diaphragmatic congestion, and improve lung function-related indicators and immune inflammation indicators. There were statistically significant differences in all efficacy evaluation criteria.

conclusionThe clinical curative effect of acupuncture treatment for cough-variant asthma is precise and has certain advantages in relieving symptoms and reducing the recurrence rate. However, the low quality of the evaluation in the RCT research literature is a problem, and more high-quality clinical randomized controlled trials are needed to further verify the comprehensive clinical efficacy and safety of this treatment. Registration number: PROSPERO (no. CRD42020155244) (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/).

Identifiers

PMID33868443
PMCPMC8034997
OpenAlexW3146060972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.