Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33868400›Full record

ArticleNeural plasticity2021

Sensorimotor, Attentional, and Neuroanatomical Predictors of Upper Limb Motor Deficits and Rehabilitation Outcome after Stroke.

Daniela D'Imperio, Zaira Romeo, Lorenza Maistrello, Eugenia Durgoni, Camilla Della Pietà, Michele De Filippo De Grazia, Francesca Meneghello, Andrea Turolla, Marco Zorzi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural plasticity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniela D'ImperioIRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3588-6924
Zaira RomeoIRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0144-5840
Lorenza MaistrelloIRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2955-4376
Eugenia DurgoniIRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4937-4009
Camilla Della PietàIRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5393-5027
Michele De Filippo De GraziaIRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3682-8582
Francesca MeneghelloIRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9412-6004
Andrea TurollaIRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1609-8060
Marco ZorziIRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4651-6390
IRCCS San Camillo Hospital · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rehabilitation of motor deficits following stroke relies on both sensorimotor and cognitive abilities, thereby involving large-scale brain networks. However, few studies have investigated the integration between motor and cognitive domains, as well as its neuroanatomical basis. In this retrospective study, upper limb motor responsiveness to technology-based rehabilitation was examined in a sample of 29 stroke patients (18 with right and 11 with left brain damage). Pretreatment sensorimotor and attentional abilities were found to influence motor recovery. Training responsiveness increased as a function of the severity of motor deficits, whereas spared attentional abilities, especially visuospatial attention, supported motor improvements. Neuroanatomical analysis of structural lesions and white matter disconnections showed that the poststroke motor performance was associated with putamen, insula, corticospinal tract, and frontoparietal connectivity. Motor rehabilitation outcome was mainly associated with the superior longitudinal fasciculus and partial involvement of the corpus callosum. The latter findings support the hypothesis that motor recovery engages large-scale brain networks that involve cognitive abilities and provides insight into stroke rehabilitation strategies.

Indexed as

Stroke RehabilitationAgedAged, 80 and overCognitionFemaleFrontal LobeFunctional LateralityHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMovement DisordersParietal LobePsychomotor PerformanceRecovery of FunctionRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID33868400
PMCPMC8035034
OpenAlexW3141405397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.