ArticleFrontiers in genetics2021
iDNA-MT: Identification DNA Modification Sites in Multiple Species by Using Multi-Task Learning Based a Neural Network Tool.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- MCAMEF-BERT: an efficient deep learning method for RNA N7-methylguanosine site prediction via multi-branch feature integration.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- iDNA-ITLM: An interpretable and transferable learning model for identifying DNA methylation.PloS one · 2024Article
- 6mA-StackingCV: an improved stacking ensemble model for predicting DNA N6-methyladenine site.BioData mining · 2023Article
- Computational prediction of promotors inFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- MuLan-Methyl-multiple transformer-based language models for accurate DNA methylation prediction.GigaScience · 2022Article
- Systematic Analysis and Accurate Identification of DNA N4-Methylcytosine Sites by Deep Learning.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationDNA N4-methylcytosine (4mC) and N6-methyladenine (6mA) are two important DNA modifications and play crucial roles in a variety of biological processes. Accurate identification of the modifications is essential to better understand their biological functions and mechanisms. However, existing methods to identify 4mA or 6mC sites are all single tasks, which demonstrates that they can identify only a certain modification in one species. Therefore, it is desirable to develop a novel computational method to identify the modification sites in multiple species simultaneously.
resultsIn this study, we proposed a computational method, called iDNA-MT, to identify 4mC sites and 6mA sites in multiple species, respectively. The proposed iDNA-MT mainly employed multi-task learning coupled with the bidirectional gated recurrent units (BGRU) to capture the sharing information among different species directly from DNA primary sequences. Experimental comparative results on two benchmark datasets, containing different species respectively, show that either for identifying 4mA or for 6mC site in multiple species, the proposed iDNA-MT outperforms other state-of-the-art single-task methods. The promising results have demonstrated that iDNA-MT has great potential to be a powerful and practically useful tool to accurately identify DNA modifications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.