Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33868378›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2021

Improving Genomic Prediction for Seed Quality Traits in Oat (Avena sativa L.) Using Trait-Specific Relationship Matrices.

Malachy T Campbell, Haixiao Hu, Trevor H Yeats, Lauren J Brzozowski, Melanie Caffe-Treml, Lucía Gutiérrez, Kevin P Smith, Mark E Sorrells, Michael A Gore, Jean-Luc Jannink

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Malachy T CampbellPlant Breeding & Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Haixiao HuPlant Breeding & Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Trevor H YeatsPlant Breeding & Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Lauren J BrzozowskiPlant Breeding & Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Melanie Caffe-TremlSeed Technology Lab 113, Agronomy, Horticulture & Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, United States.
Lucía GutiérrezDepartment of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Kevin P SmithDepartment of Agronomy & Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, United States.
Mark E SorrellsPlant Breeding & Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Michael A GorePlant Breeding & Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Jean-Luc JanninkPlant Breeding & Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Cornell University · USRobert W. Holley Center for Agriculture & Health · USSouth Dakota State University · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The observable phenotype is the manifestation of information that is passed along different organization levels (transcriptional, translational, and metabolic) of a biological system. The widespread use of various omic technologies (RNA-sequencing, metabolomics, etc.) has provided plant genetics and breeders with a wealth of information on pertinent intermediate molecular processes that may help explain variation in conventional traits such as yield, seed quality, and fitness, among others. A major challenge is effectively using these data to help predict the genetic merit of new, unobserved individuals for conventional agronomic traits. Trait-specific genomic relationship matrices (TGRMs) model the relationships between individuals using genome-wide markers (SNPs) and place greater emphasis on markers that most relevant to the trait compared to conventional genomic relationship matrices. Given that these approaches define relationships based on putative causal loci, it is expected that these approaches should improve predictions for related traits. In this study we evaluated the use of TGRMs to accommodate information on intermediate molecular phenotypes (referred to as endophenotypes) and to predict an agronomic trait, total lipid content, in oat seed. Nine fatty acids were quantified in a panel of 336 oat lines. Marker effects were estimated for each endophenotype, and were used to construct TGRMs. A multikernel TRGM model (MK-TRGM-BLUP) was used to predict total seed lipid content in an independent panel of 210 oat lines. The MK-TRGM-BLUP approach significantly improved predictions for total lipid content when compared to a conventional genomic BLUP (gBLUP) approach. Given that the MK-TGRM-BLUP approach leverages information on the nine fatty acids to predict genetic values for total lipid content in unobserved individuals, we compared the MK-TGRM-BLUP approach to a multi-trait gBLUP (MT-gBLUP) approach that jointly fits phenotypes for fatty acids and total lipid content. The MK-TGRM-BLUP approach significantly outperformed MT-gBLUP. Collectively, these results highlight the utility of using TGRM to accommodate information on endophenotypes and improve genomic prediction for a conventional agronomic trait.

Indexed as

Bayesian regressiongenomic predictiongenomicslipidsmetabolomicsoatsplant breeding

Identifiers

PMID33868378
PMCPMC8044359
OpenAlexW3151447393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.