Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33868223›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2021

High Throughput Multi-Omics Approaches for Clinical Trial Evaluation and Drug Discovery.

Jessica M Zielinski, Jason J Luke, Silvia Guglietta, Carsten Krieg

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Cancer chemoprevention: signaling pathways and strategic approaches.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Artificial Intelligence in Metabolomics: A Current Review.Trends in analytical chemistry : TRAC · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Applications of Flow Cytometry in Drug Discovery and Translational Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  18. Tackling neurodegenerationFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica M ZielinskiHollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, SC, United States.
Jason J LukeHillman Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Silvia GugliettaHollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, SC, United States.
Carsten KriegHollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, SC, United States.
MUSC Hollings Cancer Center · USMedical University of South Carolina · USUPMC Hillman Cancer Center · US

Funding

Translational Science Laboratory Shared ResourceP30CA138313 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI John J Lemasters · 2009 to 2026
$42.7M
The role of SMAD1 and SATB2 in colon patterningP20GM130457 · NIGMS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Evan R Delgado · 2020 to 2026
$18.7M
Proteomics CoreP30DK123704 · NIDDK · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Garth R Swanson · 2020 to 2026
$8.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA138313NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK123704NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM130457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High throughput single cell multi-omics platforms, such as mass cytometry (cytometry by time-of-flight; CyTOF), high dimensional imaging (>6 marker; Hyperion, MIBIscope, CODEX, MACSima) and the recently evolved genomic cytometry (Citeseq or REAPseq) have enabled unprecedented insights into many biological and clinical questions, such as hematopoiesis, transplantation, cancer, and autoimmunity. In synergy with constantly adapting new single-cell analysis approaches and subsequent accumulating big data collections from these platforms, whole atlases of cell types and cellular and sub-cellular interaction networks are created. These atlases build an ideal scientific discovery environment for reference and data mining approaches, which often times reveals new cellular disease networks. In this review we will discuss how combinations and fusions of different -omic workflows on a single cell level can be used to examine cellular phenotypes, immune effector functions, and even dynamic changes, such as metabolomic state of different cells in a sample or even in a defined tissue location. We will touch on how pre-print platforms help in optimization and reproducibility of workflows, as well as community outreach. We will also shortly discuss how leveraging single cell multi-omic approaches can be used to accelerate cellular biomarker discovery during clinical trials to predict response to therapy, follow responsive cell types, and define novel druggable target pathways. Single cell proteome approaches already have changed how we explore cellular mechanism in disease and during therapy. Current challenges in the field are how we share these disruptive technologies to the scientific communities while still including new approaches, such as genomic cytometry and single cell metabolomics.

Indexed as

Flow CytometryHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysBiomarkersDrug DiscoveryGenomicsHumansMetabolomicsProteomicsSingle-Cell AnalysisBiomarkersbioinformaticsbiomarkerCite/REAP-seqCyTOF/mass cytometryhigh-dimensional analysismachine learning

Identifiers

PMID33868223
PMCPMC8044891
OpenAlexW3152474624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.