Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33867808›Full record

ArticleEducation and information technologies2021

Evaluating the use of informational technologies by students of healthcare colleges for academic purposes over a five-year period.

Ali Azeez Al-Jumaili, Kawther K Ahmed, Ahmed Kadhim Al-Jalehawi, Bashar G Al-Fatlawi, Mohammed D Al-Rekabi, Oday Sajjad Al-Sawad, Falah Hasan Shari, Bernard Sorofman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Education and information technologies, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Factors impacting job satisfaction among pharmacists in the Arab world: A qualitative study.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ali Azeez Al-JumailiUniversity of Baghdad College of Pharmacy, Baghdad, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0003-4691-0280
Kawther K AhmedUniversity of Baghdad College of Pharmacy, Baghdad, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0002-8526-0447
Ahmed Kadhim Al-JalehawiUniversity of AlKafeel College of Pharmacy, Al-Najaf, Iraq.
Bashar G Al-FatlawiCenter of Training and Development, Al-Diwaniyah Health Directorate and Qadisiyah University College of Pharmacy, Al-Qādisiyyah, Iraq.
Mohammed D Al-RekabiUniversity of AlKafeel College of Pharmacy, Al-Najaf, Iraq.
Oday Sajjad Al-SawadUniversity of Basra College of Pharmacy, Basra, Iraq.
Falah Hasan ShariUniversity of Basra College of Pharmacy, Basra, Iraq.
Bernard SorofmanUniversity of Iowa College of Pharmacy, Iowa, IA USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the extent to which healthcare students use five informational technologies for daily academic purposes and to examine the changes in student perceptions toward these technologies over five years. This was a cross-sectional descriptive study in 10 different colleges in seven governorates. We conducted a survey using the instruments developed from the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The surveys were administered to convenience samples of students at the colleges of pharmacy, medicine, and dentistry in the participating universities. The survey was conducted three times over three different years: 2015, 2018, 2020. Five Information and Communication Technology components were included in the study: electronic course management (ECM), internet, computer, audio recording/commentary, and PowerPoint slides. The surveys were electronic and administered using Qualtrics Survey Software. For most respondents, the survey links were administered electronically via Facebook groups to convenience samples of students of the Bachelor programs. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to measure the difference among the three (years) surveys results. The multiple linear regression analysis was used to measure the associations between the five predictors of the TAM and the outcome variable (actual use of technology). There was a total of 3,113 valid surveys collected in 2015, 2018, and 2020. Nearly two thirds of participants were females. Most students did not have enough experience in using ECM before classes closure in March 2020. Lack of facilitating conditions and infrastructures like an expert technical support team and stable internet connections are negatively impacting students' acceptance of technology use in education. Moving from mainly face-to-face learning with partial electronic use in 2015 and 2018 to totally virtual learning in 2020 had a negative impact on the perceptions of healthcare college students of the five technologies across the five TAM domains (perceived usefulness, facilitating condition, ease of use, attitude toward use, intention to use) and the actual use of these technologies. The TAM successfully explained the factors influencing the actual use of technologies by healthcare college students. Continuing technical support and training can reduce students' electronic challenges. Technical status assessment needs to be done at the beginning, mid and end of the semester to evaluate the technical challenges facing students in online learning. The study tools are internationally adoptable to evaluate the student perceptions of the ICT implementation for research and academic annual assessment purposes.

Indexed as

Electronic course managementHealthcare collegesInformational technologyTechnology acceptance model

Identifiers

PMID33867808
PMCPMC8034511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.