ArticleJournal of algebra and its applications2020
IDENTIFYING THE NUMBER OF COMPONENTS IN GAUSSIAN MIXTURE MODELS USING NUMERICAL ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY.
Article in Journal of algebra and its applications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Using Gaussian mixture models for clustering is a statistically mature method for clustering in data science with numerous successful applications in science and engineering. The parameters for a Gaussian mixture model are typically estimated from training data using the iterative expectation-maximization algorithm, which requires the number of Gaussian components a priori. In this study, we propose two algorithms rooted in numerical algebraic geometry, namely an area-based algorithm and a local maxima algorithm, to identify the optimal number of components. The area-based algorithm transforms several Gaussian mixture models with varying number of components into sets of equivalent polynomial regression splines. Next, it uses homotopy continuation methods for evaluating the resulting splines to identify the number of components that results in the best fit. The local maxima algorithm forms a set of polynomials by fitting a smoothing spline to a kernel density estimate of the data. Next, it uses numerical algebraic geometry to solve the system of the first derivatives for finding the local maxima of the resulting smoothing spline, which estimates the number of mixture components. The local maxima algorithm also identifies the location of the centers of Gaussian components. Using a real-world case study in automotive manufacturing and multiple simulations, we compare the performance of the proposed algorithms with that of Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC), which are popular methods in the literature. We show the proposed algorithms are more robust than AIC and BIC when the Gaussian assumption is violated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.