Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33867584›Full record

ArticleOutlook on agriculture2021

"Breaking through the 40% adoption ceiling: Mind the seed system gaps." A perspective on seed systems research for development in One CGIAR.

Margaret A McEwan, Conny Jm Almekinders, Jorge Jl Andrade-Piedra, Erik Delaquis, Karen A Garrett, Lava Kumar, Sarah Mayanja, Bonaventure A Omondi, Srinivasulu Rajendran, Graham Thiele

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Outlook on agriculture, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Genomics-driven breeding for local adaptation of durum wheat is enhanced by farmers' traditional knowledge.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Navigating toward resilient and inclusive seed systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Margaret A McEwanInternational Potato Center (CIP), Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8510-0526
Conny Jm AlmekindersCGIAR Research Program on Roots Tubers and Bananas, Lima, Peru.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9779-5150
Jorge Jl Andrade-PiedraCGIAR Research Program on Roots Tubers and Bananas, Lima, Peru.
Erik DelaquisCGIAR Research Program on Roots Tubers and Bananas, Lima, Peru.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1427-6572
Karen A GarrettCGIAR Research Program on Roots Tubers and Bananas, Lima, Peru.
Lava KumarCGIAR Research Program on Roots Tubers and Bananas, Lima, Peru.
Sarah MayanjaCGIAR Research Program on Roots Tubers and Bananas, Lima, Peru.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9698-0036
Bonaventure A OmondiCGIAR Research Program on Roots Tubers and Bananas, Lima, Peru.
Srinivasulu RajendranInternational Potato Center (CIP), Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2769-2548
Graham ThieleCGIAR Research Program on Roots Tubers and Bananas, Lima, Peru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seed systems research is central to achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Improved varieties with promise for ending hunger, improving nutrition, and increasing livelihood security may be released, but how do they reach and benefit different types of farmers? Without widespread adoption the genetic gains achieved with improved crop varieties can never be actualized. Progress has been made toward demand responsive breeding, however the draft CGIAR 2030 Research and Innovation Strategy fails to recognize the complexity of seed systems and thus presents a narrow vision for the future of seed systems research. This points to the lack of evidence-based dialogue between seed systems researchers and breeders. This perspective paper presents findings from an interdisciplinary group of more than 50 CGIAR scientists who used a suite of seed systems tools to identify four knowledge gaps and associated insights from work on the seed systems for vegetatively propagated crops (VPCs), focusing on bananas (especially cooking bananas and plantains), cassava, potato, sweetpotato, and yam. We discuss the implications for thinking about and intervening in seed systems using a combined biophysical and socioeconomic perspective and how this can contribute to increased varietal adoption and benefits to farmers. The tools merit wider use, not only for the seed systems of VPCs, but for the seed of crops facing similar adoption challenges. We argue for deeper collaboration between seed systems researchers, breeders and national seed system stakeholders to address these and other knowledge gaps and generate the evidence and innovations needed to break through the 40% adoption ceiling for modern varieties, and ensure good quality seed once the new varieties have been adopted. Without this, the achievements of breeders may remain stuck in the seed delivery pipeline.

Indexed as

farmers’ demand for seedrootseed delivery profileseed health strategyseed qualityseed regulationtuber and banana cropsvarietal adoptionVegetatively propagated crops

Identifiers

PMID33867584
PMCPMC8022077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.