Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33867566›Full record

ArticleHuman development2020

An Ecological Approach To Learning In (Not And) Development.

Karen E Adolph

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human development, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Learning to Move in a Changing Body in a Changing World.Integrative and comparative biology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Ten lessons about infants' everyday experiences.Current directions in psychological science · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Learning to move in the real world.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karen E AdolphNew York University.
New York University · US

Funding

Play & Learning Across a Year (PLAY)R01HD094830 · NICHD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI ADOLPH, KAREN E, GILMORE, RICK O · 2018 to 2023
$6.3M
Flexibility of Learning in Infant Skill AcquisitionR01HD033486 · NICHD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI ADOLPH, KAREN E · 2001 to 2023
$4.5M
Learning About Hidden AffordancesR01HD086034 · NICHD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI ADOLPH, KAREN E, TAMIS-LEMONDA, CATHERINE S · 2016 to 2020
$2.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD033486NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD086034NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD094830
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ecological approach is a framework for studying the behavior of animals in their environments. My version of an ecological approach focuses on learning in the context of development. I argue that the most important thing animals learn is behavioral flexibility. They must acquire the ability to flexibly guide their behavior from moment to moment in the midst of developmental changes in their bodies, brains, skills, and environments. They must select, modify, and create behaviors appropriate to the current situation. In essence, animals must learn how to learn. I describe the central concepts and empirical strategies for studying learning in development and use examples of infants coping with novel tasks to give a flavor of what researchers know and still must discover about the functions and processes of learning (to learn) in (not and) development.

Identifiers

PMID33867566
PMCPMC8048368
OpenAlexW2982732723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.