Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33867274›Full record

GuidelineBrazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology

Guideline for the use of immunobiologicals in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) in Brazil.

Wilma T Anselmo-Lima, Edwin Tamashiro, Fabrizio R Romano, Marcel M Miyake, Renato Roithmann, Eduardo M Kosugi, Márcio Nakanishi, Marco A Fornazieri, Thiago F P Bezerra, João F Mello and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReviewPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Wilma T Anselmo-LimaUniversidade de São Paulo (USP), Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto (FMRP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Edwin TamashiroUniversidade de São Paulo (USP), Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto (FMRP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Fabrizio R RomanoUniversidade de São Paulo (USP), Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto (FMRP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil; Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Faculdade de Medicina (FM), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Marcel M MiyakeUniversidade de São Paulo (USP), Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto (FMRP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil; Hospital da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Renato RoithmannUniversidade Luterana do Brasil, Canoas, RS, Brazil.
Eduardo M KosugiUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Márcio NakanishiUniversidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Medicina, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Marco A FornazieriUniversidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), Londrina, PR, Brazil; Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR), Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Thiago F P BezerraUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Recife, PE, Brazil.
João F MelloUniversidade de São Paulo (USP), Faculdade de Medicina (FM), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Marcus M LessaUniversidade Federal da Bahia, Faculdade de Medicina, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
Richard L VoegelsUniversidade de São Paulo (USP), Faculdade de Medicina (FM), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Otávio B PiltcherUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Faculdade de Medicina (FAMED), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Eulalia SakanoUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Faculdade de Medicina, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Fabiana C P ValeraUniversidade de São Paulo (USP), Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto (FMRP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil. Electronic address: facpvalera@fmrp.usp.br.
Universidade de Ribeirão Preto · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade de Brasília · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversidade Estadual de Londrina · BRUniversidade Federal da Bahia · BRUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRUniversidade Luterana do Brasil · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSevere uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps has a negative impact on an individual's quality of life. Therefore, new biologics have emerged for use in specific phenotypes of chronic rhinosinusitis, changing the paradigms of its treatment.

objectiveTo review the current status of biologic treatment indications in chronic rhinosinusitis.

methodsThe Brazilian Academy of Rhinology brought together different specialists to suggest a course of action, considering its particularities and aspects related to the national reality.

resultsOf particular interest for decision making will be the identification of subgroups of patients refractory to pre-existing treatment options and the construction of a strategy that improves their quality of life, with the best cost-benefit ratio.

conclusionThe use of biologics is a valid option for treatment in more severe cases. This strategy must be better understood and improved in the future, with more studies and greater clinical experience.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsNasal PolypsRhinitisSinusitisBrazilChronic DiseaseHumansQuality of LifeBiological ProductsChronic rhinosinusitisImmunobiologicalsMonoclonal antibodyNasal polyps

Identifiers

PMID33867274
PMCPMC9422446
OpenAlexW3141752846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.