Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33866894›Full record

ArticleJournal of telemedicine and telecare2023

Urgent and non-emergent telehealth care for seniors: Findings from a multi-site impact study.

Paul Bernstein, Kelly J Ko, Juhi Israni, Alexandria O Cronin, Michael M Kurliand, Jiaxiao M Shi, Joanie Chung, Lina Borgo, Amanda Reed, Larissa Kosten and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of telemedicine and telecare, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Uses of Virtual Care in Primary Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Management of Acute Cystitis in the Era of COVID-19.Current bladder dysfunction reports · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Paul BernsteinInnovation Studio, Kaiser Permanente, Tustin, CA, USA.
Kelly J KoWest Health Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Juhi IsraniWest Health Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Alexandria O CroninWest Health Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Michael M KurliandWest Health Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Jiaxiao M ShiResearch and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Joanie ChungResearch and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Lina BorgoInnovation Studio, Kaiser Permanente, Tustin, CA, USA.
Amanda ReedSpectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Larissa KostenSpectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Anna Marie ChangJefferson Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Frank D SitesJefferson Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Tadashi FunahashiInnovation Studio, Kaiser Permanente, Tustin, CA, USA.
Zia AghaWest Health Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe global pandemic has raised awareness of the need for alternative ways to deliver care, notably telehealth. Prior to this study, research has been mixed on its effectiveness and impact on downstream utilization, especially for seniors. Our multi-institution study of more than 300,000 telehealth visits for seniors evaluates the clinical outcomes and healthcare utilization for urgent and non-emergent symptoms.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study from November 2015 to March 2019, leveraging different models of telehealth from three health systems, comparing them to in-person visits for urgent and non-emergent needs of seniors based on International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition diagnoses. The study population was adults aged 60 years or older who had access to telehealth and were affiliated with and resided in the geographic region of the healthcare organization providing telehealth. The primary outcomes of interest were visit resolution and episodes of care for those that required follow-up.

resultsIn total, 313,516 telehealth visits were analysed across three healthcare organizations. Telehealth encounters were successful in resolving urgent and non-emergent needs in 84.0-86.7% of cases. When visits required follow-up, over 95% were resolved in less than three visits for both telehealth and in-person cohorts. DISCUSSION: While in-person visits have traditionally been the gold standard, our results suggest that when deployed within the confines of a patient's existing primary care and health system provider, telehealth can be an effective alternative to in-person care for urgent and non-emergent needs of seniors without increasing downstream utilization.

Indexed as

TelemedicineAdultHumansPandemicsPatient Acceptance of Health CareRetrospective StudiesGeriatricsnon-emergentseniorstelehealthurgent

Identifiers

PMID33866894
PMCPMC10394951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.