Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33866860›Full record

Trial reportJournal of interpersonal violence2022

Detection of Domestic Violence and Abuse by Community Mental Health Teams Using the BRAVE Intervention: A Multicenter, Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

Roos Ruijne, Cornelis Mulder, Milan Zarchev, Kylee Trevillion, Roel van Est, Eva Leeman, Willemien Willems, Mark van der Gaag, Carlo Garofalo, Stefan Bogaerts and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of interpersonal violence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Roos RuijneErasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0844-5149
Cornelis MulderErasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Milan ZarchevErasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2043-8566
Kylee TrevillionKing's College London, UK.
Roel van EstParnassia Psychiatric Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Eva LeemanParnassia Psychiatric Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Willemien WillemsParnassia Psychiatric Institute, The Hague, the Netherlands.
Mark van der GaagParnassia Psychiatric Institute, The Hague, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3525-6415
Carlo GarofaloTilburg University, Fivoor Science and Treatment Innovation, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2306-6961
Stefan BogaertsTilburg University, Fivoor Science and Treatment Innovation, the Netherlands.
Louise HowardParnassia Psychiatric Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Astrid KampermanErasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4455-6492
Parnassia Groep · NLTilburg University · NLKing's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite increased prevalence of domestic violence and abuse (DVA), victimization through DVA often remains undetected in mental health care. To estimate the effectiveness of a system provider level training intervention by comparing the detection and referral rates of DVA of intervention community mental health (CMH) teams with rates in control CMH teams. We also aimed to determine whether improvements in knowledge, skills and attitudes to DVA were greater in clinicians working in intervention CMH teams than those working in control teams. We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial in two urban areas of the Netherlands. Detection and referral rates were assessed at baseline and at 6 and 12 months after the start of the intervention. DVA knowledge, skills and attitudes were assessed using a survey at baseline and at 6 and 12 months after start of the intervention. Electronic patient files were used to identify detected and referred cases of DVA. Outcomes were compared between the intervention and control teams using a generalized linear mixed model. During the 12-month follow-up, detection and referral rates did not differ between the intervention and control teams. However, improvements in knowledge, skills and attitude during that follow-up period were greater in intervention teams than in control teams: β 3.21 (95% CI 1.18-4.60). Our trial showed that a training program on DVA knowledge and skills in CMH teams can increase knowledge and attitude towards DVA. However, our intervention does not appear to increase the detection or referral rates of DVA in patients with a severe mental illness. A low detection rate of DVA remains a major problem. Interventions with more obligatory elements and a focus on improving communication between CMH teams and DVA services are recommended.

Indexed as

Crime VictimsDomestic ViolenceMental DisordersHumansMental HealthReferral and Consultationdomestic violence and abuseinterpersonal violenceoutreaching healthcarerandomized controlled trialsevere mental illnessvictimization

Identifiers

PMID33866860
PMCPMC9382347
OpenAlexW3156242766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.