Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33866853›Full record

ArticleClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis

Portuguese Consensus and Recommendations for Acquired Coagulopathic Bleeding Management (CCBM).

Manuela Gomes, Anabela Rodrigues, Alexandre Carrilho, José Aguiar, Luciana Gonçalves, Fernando Fernandez-Llimos, Filipa Duarte-Ramos, Joana Rodrigues

Open access · goldAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Manuela GomesTransfusion Medicine Department, Hemovida, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7749-8690
Anabela RodriguesTransfusion Medicine Department, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal.
Alexandre CarrilhoAnesthesiology Department, Hospital de São José, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal.
José AguiarAnesthesiology Department, Hospital Lusíadas, Porto, Portugal.
Luciana GonçalvesTransfusion Medicine Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal.
Fernando Fernandez-LlimosDepartment of Drug Sciences, Laboratory of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Filipa Duarte-RamosDepartment of Social Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Joana RodriguesCSL Behring, Lisbon, Portugal.
Hospital de Santa Maria · PTHospital de São João · PTHospital de São José · PTLusíada University of Porto · PTUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to determine how Portuguese physicians handle major bleeding. We also aim to establish global diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations to be followed in clinical practice by using a step-wise approach of evidence generation. This study followed a three-step process: a steering committee desk review, a Delphi technique, an expert panel meeting. A modified 3-round Delphi including 31 statements was performed. Questions were answered in a five-point Likert-type scale. Consensus threshold was established as a percentage of agreement among participants ≥90% in the first round, and ≥85% in the second and third rounds. The level of consensus achieved by panelists was discussed with the scientific committee (January-2020). Fifty-one physicians participated in the study (compliance rate >90%). Analyzing the three rounds, consensus was reached on 20 items (64.5%) in the first, 4/11 items (36.4%) in the second and 6/7 items (85.7%) in the third. One statement about administration of clotting factor concentrates for bleeding control did not reach consensus. A high level of consensus was reached toward the need for implementing Patient Blood Management strategies in Portuguese hospitals, reduce exposure to allogeneic blood components, to use goal directed therapies for acquired bleeding management, and the need for evaluating blood transfusion indirect costs. A final version with 12 recommendations was built, according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Our results provide critically appraised and updated evidence on bleeding coagulopathies management in Portugal. Additional studies, mainly about indirect costs of blood transfusion, are needed.

Indexed as

Delphi TechniqueHemorrhageHumansPortugalacquired blood coagulation disordersbleeding managementconsensusdelphi techniquegrade approach

Identifiers

PMID33866853
PMCPMC8718168
OpenAlexW3154632623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.