Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33866515›Full record

ReviewDermatology and therapy2021

Looking into a Better Future: Novel Therapies for Metastatic Melanoma.

Alessia Villani, Massimiliano Scalvenzi, Gabriella Fabbrocini, Jorge Ocampo-Candiani, Sonia Sofía Ocampo-Garza

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dermatology and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. The Treatment of Advanced Melanoma: Therapeutic Update.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alessia VillaniDermatology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy. ali.vil@hotmail.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6430-268X
Massimiliano Scalvenzi *Dermatology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Gabriella FabbrociniDermatology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Jorge Ocampo-CandianiDermatology Department, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, University Hospital "Dr. José Eleuterio González", Monterrey, NL, Mexico.
Sonia Sofía Ocampo-GarzaDermatology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León · MXUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITFederico II University Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Even though melanoma represents a small percentage of all cutaneous cancers, it is responsible for most deaths from skin neoplasms. In early stages it can be successfully treated with surgery, but as the disease expands the survival rate drops significantly. For many years the mainstay of treatment for metastatic melanoma was chemotherapeutic agents, even though they failed to prove survival prolongation. After the advent of ipilimumab, a survival benefit and better overall response rate could be offered to the patients. Other new therapies, such as immunotherapies, targeted therapies, vaccines, and small molecules, are currently being studied. Also, combination regimens have demonstrated superiority to some monotherapies. Nowadays, ipilimumab should no longer be considered the first-line therapy given its severe toxicity and lower efficacy, while nivolumab remains efficacious and has a good safety profile. T-VEC as monotherapy has been shown to be an elegant alternative even for the elderly or cases of head and neck melanomas. If the BRAF mutation status is positive, the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib could be an option to consider. Despite the success of the novel treatments, their effectiveness is still limited. New studies have opened up new avenues for future research in melanoma treatment, which is expected to lead to better therapeutic outcomes for our patients. The objective of this review is to discuss the novel therapies for metastatic melanoma that have been tested in humans during the last 3 years to obtain a sharper perspective of the available treatment options for specific patient characteristics.

Indexed as

Immune checkpoint inhibitorsMelanomaMetastatic melanomaSmall moleculesTargeted therapyVaccines

Identifiers

PMID33866515
PMCPMC8163929
OpenAlexW3154275034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.