Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33866459›Full record

ArticleJournal of plant research2021

Corolla stickiness prevents nectar robbing in Erica.

Sam McCarren, Anina Coetzee, Jeremy Midgley

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of plant research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sam McCarrenDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, 7701, South Africa. z.mccarren@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3861-0811
Anina CoetzeeFitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town, 7700, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1646-557X
Jeremy MidgleyDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, 7701, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7831-2301

Funding

National Research Foundation MND190724458797
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Floral stickiness is a rare trait with unknown function, but it is common in the mega-diverse Cape genus Erica (Ericaceae). This study investigated the role of stickiness measured as adhesive strength in Erica as protection against nectar robbing and its correlation with floral traits. We compared the incidence of nectar robbing in flowers of the same species with or without experimentally added stickiness, and amongst communities of co-occurring species with flowers differing in stickiness. Additionally, we tested the relationship between stickiness and pollination syndrome, corolla shape, corolla length and sepal-corolla ratio across the whole genus. Stickiness was correlated with lower floral damage rates within and between species, indicating it functions as an anti-nectar robbing trait. Across the genus Erica, stickiness is most strongly correlated with bird and long-proboscid fly pollination, presumably because of their larger nectar rewards. Stickiness was also correlated with floral traits that are often associated with high risk of being damaged by nectar robbers: narrow-mouthed corollas, long corollas and shorter sepals. These results show that corolla stickiness defends Erica flowers against nectar robbing and thereby potentially improves fitness.

Indexed as

EricaceaePlant NectarAnimalsBirdsFlowersPollinationPlant NectarFloral defenceFlorivoryFynbosHerbivoryPlant defence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.