ArticleSurgery today2021
Mesh repair under the anterior lamina of the rectus sheath (MUAR) for abdominal incisional hernia.
Article in Surgery today, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAbdominal incisional hernia is a frequent complication of major abdominal operations. Our method of performing mesh repair under the anterior lamina of the rectus sheath (MUAR) involves placing mesh between the dorsal surface of the anterior rectus sheath and the rectus abdominis muscle. We evaluated the short-term and long-term outcomes of our MUAR method.
methodsThe subjects of this retrospective study were 80 patients with abdominal incisional hernia, who underwent MUAR at our hospital between August, 2009 and September, 2018. We investigated the rate of recurrence and postoperative complications in these patients, who were followed-up postoperatively for at least 18 months. Patients who completed all visits were then followed-up further with questionnaires.
resultsThe recurrence rate after MUAR was 0%. Postoperative complications consisted of subcutaneous wound infections in two patients (2.5%), successfully treated with wound cleansing and antibiotics; and subcutaneous hematoma in three patients (3.8%), which was spontaneously absorbed in two patients, and removed in one. There were no other complications, such as seroma, intestinal obstruction, mesh infection and bulging, or prolonged postoperative pain.
conclusionMesh repair under the anterior lamina of the rectus sheath is simple and safe with positive short-term and long-term outcomes, suggesting that it is a good option for incisional hernia repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.