Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33866401›Full record

Observational studyWorld journal of urology2021

Infection rate and complications after 621 transperineal MRI-TRUS fusion biopsies in local anesthesia without standard antibiotic prophylaxis.

K Günzel, A Magheli, E Baco, H Cash, S Heinrich, H Neubert, J Schlegel, M Schostak, T Henkel, P Asbach and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in World journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Targeted biopsy of the prostate.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. [MR-Guided Targeted Prostate Biopsy from Radiologists' Perspective].Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Oral antibiotics perturbation on gut microbiota after prostate biopsy.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

K GünzelDepartment of Urology, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban Berlin, Dieffenbachstraße 1, 10967, Berlin, Germany. Karsten.guenzel2@vivantes.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0504-3475
A MagheliDepartment of Urology, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban Berlin, Dieffenbachstraße 1, 10967, Berlin, Germany.
E BacoDepartment of Urology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
H CashDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
S HeinrichDepartment of Urology, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban Berlin, Dieffenbachstraße 1, 10967, Berlin, Germany.
H NeubertDepartment of Urology, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban Berlin, Dieffenbachstraße 1, 10967, Berlin, Germany.
J SchlegelDepartment of Urology, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban Berlin, Dieffenbachstraße 1, 10967, Berlin, Germany.
M SchostakDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
T HenkelDepartment of Urology, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban Berlin, Dieffenbachstraße 1, 10967, Berlin, Germany.
P AsbachDepartment of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
S HinzDepartment of Urology, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban Berlin, Dieffenbachstraße 1, 10967, Berlin, Germany.
Vivantes Klinikum · DEUniversity Hospital Magdeburg · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEOslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to assess the post biopsy infection rate, feasibility and prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate (CDR) by performing transperineal MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy of the prostate (TPBx) under local anesthesia (LA) without antibiotic prophylaxis (AP).

methodsWe prospectively screened 766 men with suspicious lesions on mpMRI, an elevated PSA level or a suspect digital examination undergoing MRI-TRUS-TPBx in LA, from May 2019 to July 2020. Patients with the need for antibiotic prophylaxis or without a PI-RADS target lesion were excluded from final analyses. We reported CDR, perioperative pain (0-10) and postoperative complications. PCa with an ISUP grade ≥ 2 was classified as clinically significant PCa (csPCa).

resultsWe included 621 patients with a median age of 68 years (IQR 62-74), a PSA of 6.43 ng/mL (IQR 4.72-9.91) and a prostate volume of 45 cc (IQR 32-64). In median, 4 targeted (TB) (IQR 3-4) and 6 (IQR 5-7) systematic biopsies (SB) detected in combination overall 416 (67%) PCa and 324 (52%) csPCa. Overall CDR of TB for PI-RADS 3, 4 and 5 was 26%, 65% and 84%, respectively. Patients reported a median perioperative pain level of 2 (IQR 1-3). Four patients (0.6%) developed a post biopsy infection, one experienced urosepsis.

conclusionOur results demonstrate that transperineal MRI-TRUS fusion-guided prostate biopsy under LA without AP is feasible, safe and well tolerated.

Indexed as

AgedAnesthesia, LocalAntibiotic ProphylaxisEndosonographyHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingPerineumProstateProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesSepsisProstate-Specific AntigenAntibiotic prophylaxisFusion biopsyLocal anesthesiaProstateTransperineal biopsy

Identifiers

PMID33866401
OpenAlexW3155837214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.