Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33866384›Full record

SynthesisSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2021

How do employment conditions and psychosocial workplace exposures impact the mental health of young workers? A systematic review.

M Shields, S Dimov, A Kavanagh, A Milner, M J Spittal, T L King

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Psychosocial work factors affecting mental health of young workers: a systematic review.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Aspects of young employees' mental health: a narrative review.International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Mental health and well-being at the workplace.Indian journal of psychiatry · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M ShieldsDisability and Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010, Australia. marissa.shields@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2392-616X
S DimovDisability and Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5487-5935
A KavanaghDisability and Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1573-3464
A MilnerDisability and Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4657-0503
M J SpittalCentre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2841-1536
T L KingDisability and Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1201-2485

Funding

Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Researcher Award DE200100607Australian Research Council Future Fellowship FT180100075National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Partnership Project APP1151843
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the quality of the research about how employment conditions and psychosocial workplace exposures impact the mental health of young workers, and to summarize the available evidence.

methodsWe undertook a systematic search of three databases using a tiered search strategy. Studies were included if they: (a) assessed employment conditions such as working hours, precarious employment, contract type, insecurity, and flexible work, or psychosocial workplace exposures such as violence, harassment and bullying, social support, job demand and control, effort-reward imbalance, and organizational justice; (b) included a validated mental health measure; and (c) presented results specific to young people aged ≤ 30 years or were stratified by age group to provide an estimate for young people aged ≤ 30 years. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Exposures (ROBINS-E) tool.

resultsNine studies were included in the review. Four were related to employment conditions, capturing contract type and working hours. Five studies captured concepts relevant to psychosocial workplace exposures including workplace sexual harassment, psychosocial job quality, work stressors, and job control. The quality of the included studies was generally low, with six of the nine at serious risk of bias. Three studies at moderate risk of bias were included in the qualitative synthesis, and results of these showed contemporaneous exposure to sexual harassment and poor psychosocial job quality was associated with poorer mental health outcomes among young workers. Longitudinal evidence showed that exposure to low job control was associated with incident depression diagnosis among young workers.

conclusionsThe findings of this review illustrate that even better studies are at moderate risk of bias. Addressing issues related to confounding, selection of participants, measurement of exposures and outcomes, and missing data will improve the quality of future research in this area and lead to a clearer understanding of how employment conditions and psychosocial workplace exposures impact the mental health of young people. Generating high-quality evidence is particularly critical given the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on young people's employment. In preparing for a post-pandemic world where poor-quality employment conditions and exposure to psychosocial workplace exposures may become more prevalent, rigorous research must exist to inform policy to protect the mental health of young workers.

Indexed as

EmploymentMental HealthWorkplaceAdultHumansOrganizational CultureSocial JusticeYoung AdultEmployment conditionsMental healthPsychosocial workplace exposureReviewRisk of biasWorkYoung people

Identifiers

PMID33866384
PMCPMC8053023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.