Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33866224›Full record

ArticleAddictive behaviors2021

Exploratory evaluation of online brief education for JUUL pod-mod use and prevention.

Eleanor L S Leavens, Matthew J Carpenter, Tracy T Smith, Nicole L Nollen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive behaviors, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eleanor L S LeavensMedical University of South Carolina, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, United States; University of Kansas School of Medicine, Department of Population Health, United States. Electronic address: eleavens@kumc.edu.
Matthew J CarpenterMedical University of South Carolina, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, United States.
Tracy T SmithMedical University of South Carolina, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, United States.
Nicole L NollenUniversity of Kansas School of Medicine, Department of Population Health, United States.

Funding

NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002368 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Jennifer Lynn Goldman, NICOLE L NOLLEN · 2017 to 2026
$4.0M
Impact of e-cigarette characteristics on reinforcement and tobacco use patterns among current smokersK01DA047433 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI SMITH, TRACY TAYLOR · 2019 to 2023
$988k
Minimizing Fall-Related Injury in Older Adults: a motor learning approachR21AG073892 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI SOSNOFF, JACOB J. · 2021 to 2022
$429k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002368NIA NIH HHS R21 AG073892NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA047433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInitiation of e-cigarette use by young adults is a significant public health issue within the debate on vaping. The current study is an exploratory evaluation of brief educational information among young adults and investigated outcomes as a function of JUUL use and smoking status.

methodsParticipants (N = 947) were young adults (<30 years old) recruited from Amazon's Mechanical Turk based on smoking and JUUL use status. Participants completed baseline assessments, viewed a brief JUUL educational handout, and completed post-assessments.

resultsThere was a significant Time X Group interaction for JUUL-related knowledge (p < .001), with never JUUL/never smokers showing the greatest increase in knowledge. Brief education increased JUUL-related knowledge and risk perceptions and had a modest impact on commitment to quitting and readiness to quit JUUL (all p ≤ 0.001; ds = 0.06-0.74; time × group p > .05 for all contrasts except JUUL-related knowledge). Participants showed modest decreases in interest in future JUUL use, interest in purchasing, and interest in future regular use (all p ≤ 0.001; ds = 0.07-0.08; time × group p > .05 for all contrasts). In terms of smoking outcomes, participants reported reduced perceived harm to others (p < .001; d = 0.09) and decreased intentions to smoke regularly (p = .001; d = 0.07).

conclusionsBrief education was effective in increasing knowledge and risk perceptions while showing a modest effect on intentions for future use. The information was most effective in increasing knowledge among non-users, suggesting that brief education may be useful for preventing initiation. Analysis of group differences suggest current JUUL use status is more important in informing JUUL-related attitudes than smoking status.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsSmoking CessationVapingAdultHumansPublic HealthSmokingYoung AdultBrief educationElectronic cigarettesENDSPod-modsPrevention

Identifiers

PMID33866224
PMCPMC8130911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.