Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33865990›Full record

ArticleClinical immunology (Orlando, Fla.)2021

A novel application of delayed-type hipersensitivity reaction to measure cellular immune response in SARS-CoV-2 exposed individuals.

Yvelise Barrios, Andres Franco, Inmaculada Sanchez-Machin, Paloma Poza-Guedes, Ruperto Gonzalez-Perez, Victor Matheu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical immunology (Orlando, Fla.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Allergological study in patients vaccinated against COVID-19 with suspected allergic reactions.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine-induced Pneumonitis.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yvelise BarriosImmunology Lab, Central Lab, Floor - 1, Main Building, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Ctra Ofra s/n. La Cuesta, 38320 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.
Andres FrancoImmunology Lab, Central Lab, Floor - 1, Main Building, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Ctra Ofra s/n. La Cuesta, 38320 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.
Inmaculada Sanchez-MachinAllergy Service, Floor-2, Outpatient Building, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Ctra Ofra s/n. La Cuesta, 38320 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.
Paloma Poza-GuedesAllergy Service, Floor-2, Outpatient Building, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Ctra Ofra s/n. La Cuesta, 38320 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.
Ruperto Gonzalez-PerezAllergy Service, Floor-2, Outpatient Building, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Ctra Ofra s/n. La Cuesta, 38320 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.
Victor MatheuAllergy Service, Floor-2, Outpatient Building, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Ctra Ofra s/n. La Cuesta, 38320 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain. Electronic address: vmatdel@gobiernodecanarias.org.
Hospital Universitario de Canarias · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo understand the anti-virus adaptive immune response occurring during SARS-Cov-2 infection is necessary to have methods to investigate cellular and humoral components. The goal of this study has been to investigate the utility of a specific spike-DTH test using a coronavirus recombinant protein in COVID-19 patients.

methodsDTH studies were performed by intradermal injection of a commercial recombinant spike protein from SARS-CoV-2 along with conventional serology studies.

resultsFifty-one COVID-19 patients were studied showing 84,3% of concordance with spike-DTH and anti-RBD-IgG. Spike-DTH was superior to identify seven more COVID-19 individuals. A high specificity was found with no positive spike DTH reactions in the non-sick individuals. The skin test also showed more stable results over time while specific anti-RBD-IgG decreased gradually. Clinical severity groups also showed a progressive gradient of larger positive spike-DTH.

conclusionSpecific spike DTH test seems to be an easy method to study cell immune response.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ViralCOVID-19COVID-19 Serological TestingFemaleHumansHypersensitivity, DelayedImmunity, CellularImmunoglobulin GInjections, IntradermalMaleMiddle AgedProtein DomainsRecombinant ProteinsSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin GRecombinant ProteinsSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2Cell responseCOVID-19Delayed-type hypersensitivityDTHHumoral responseSARS-cov2Skin testT-cell response

Identifiers

PMID33865990
PMCPMC8049849
OpenAlexW3156573857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.