Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33865779›Full record

Trial reportJACC. Cardiovascular imaging2021

Sex-Specific Computed Tomography Coronary Plaque Characterization and Risk of Myocardial Infarction.

Michelle C Williams, Jacek Kwiecinski, Mhairi Doris, Priscilla McElhinney, Michelle S D'Souza, Sebastien Cadet, Philip D Adamson, Alastair J Moss, Shirjel Alam, Amanda Hunter and 16 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01149590 (Role of Multidetector Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis and Management of Patients Attending a Rapid Access Chest Pain Clinic), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01149590 nacompletednot on this map

Role of Multidetector Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis and Management of Patients Attending a Rapid Access Chest Pain Clinic

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of EdinburghRan2010 to 2015Enrolled4,138ConditionsAngina Pectoris, Coronary Heart DiseaseArmsComputer Tomography Angiography
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Sex Differences in Atherosclerotic Coronary Artery Disease Patterns.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Sex differences in coronary atherosclerotic plaque activity usingEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  14. The Role of Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography in Risk Stratification for Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Compositional plaque progression in women and men with non-obstructive coronary artery disease.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Michelle C WilliamsBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Edinburgh Imaging Facility QMRI, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. Electronic address: michelle.williams@ed.ac.uk.
Jacek KwiecinskiBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Department of Interventional Cardiology and Angiology, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.
Mhairi DorisBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Priscilla McElhinneyCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Michelle S D'SouzaBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Sebastien CadetCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Philip D AdamsonBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Alastair J MossBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Shirjel AlamBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Amanda HunterBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Anoop S V ShahBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Nicholas L MillsBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Tania PawadeBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Chengjia WangBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Jonathan R Weir-McCallUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Michael Bonnici-MalliaDepartment of Radiology, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Christopher MurrillsDepartment of Radiology, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Giles RoditiInstitute of Clinical Sciences, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Edwin J R van BeekBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Edinburgh Imaging Facility QMRI, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Leslee J ShawWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
Edward D NicolRoyal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust Departments of Cardiology and Radiology, London, United Kingdom, and the National Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
Daniel S BermanCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Piotr J SlomkaCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
David E NewbyBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Edinburgh Imaging Facility QMRI, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Marc R DweckBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Edinburgh Imaging Facility QMRI, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Damini DeyCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
University of Edinburgh · GBCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USNinewells Hospital · GBCornell University · USInstitute of Cardiology · PLRoyal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Integrated prediction of cardiovascular events by automated coronary plaque and pericoronary adipose tissue quantification from CT AngiographyR01HL148787 · NHLBI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI DEY, DAMINI · 2020 to 2023
$3.0M
Automated quantitative CT imaging of epicardial adipose tissue and risk of cardiac eventsR01HL133616 · NHLBI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI DEY, DAMINI · 2016 to 2019
$2.6M
Effect of Intensive Medical Treatment on Quantified Coronary Artery Plaque Components with Serial Coronary CTA in Women with Non-Obstructive CADR01HL151266 · NHLBI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI DEY, DAMINI, TAMARAPPOO, BALAJI K. · 2020 to 2023
$1.6M
British Heart Foundation CH/09/002British Heart Foundation CH/09/002/26360British Heart Foundation CH/F/21/90010British Heart Foundation FS/11/014British Heart Foundation FS/14/78/31020British Heart Foundation FS/16/14/32023British Heart Foundation FS/17/79/33226British Heart Foundation FS/ICRF/20/26002British Heart Foundation RE/18/5/34216British Heart Foundation RG/16/10/32375British Heart Foundation RG/20/10/34966Chief Scientist Office PCL/17/04Medical Research Council G0701127NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL133616NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL148787NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL151266Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT103782AIA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study was designed to investigate whether coronary computed tomography angiography assessments of coronary plaque might explain differences in the prognosis of men and women presenting with chest pain.

backgroundImportant sex differences exist in coronary artery disease. Women presenting with chest pain have different risk factors, symptoms, prevalence of coronary artery disease and prognosis compared to men.

methodsWithin a multicenter randomized controlled trial, we explored sex differences in stenosis, adverse plaque characteristics (positive remodeling, low-attenuation plaque, spotty calcification, or napkin ring sign) and quantitative assessment of total, calcified, noncalcified and low-attenuation plaque burden.

resultsOf the 1,769 participants who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography, 772 (43%) were female. Women were more likely to have normal coronary arteries and less likely to have adverse plaque characteristics (p < 0.001 for all). They had lower total, calcified, noncalcified, and low-attenuation plaque burdens (p < 0.001 for all) and were less likely to have a low-attenuation plaque burden >4% (41% vs. 59%; p < 0.001). Over a median follow-up of 4.7 years, myocardial infarction (MI) occurred in 11 women (1.4%) and 30 men (3%). In those who had MI, women had similar total, noncalcified, and low-attenuation plaque burdens as men, but men had higher calcified plaque burden. Low-attenuation plaque burden predicted MI (hazard ratio: 1.60; 95% confidence interval: 1.10 to 2.34; p = 0.015), independent of calcium score, obstructive disease, cardiovascular risk score, and sex.

conclusionsWomen presenting with stable chest pain have less atherosclerotic plaque of all subtypes compared to men and a lower risk of subsequent MI. However, quantitative low-attenuation plaque is as strong a predictor of subsequent MI in women as in men. (Scottish Computed Tomography of the HEART Trial [SCOT-HEART]; NCT01149590).

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseMyocardial InfarctionPlaque, AtheroscleroticComputed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyCoronary VesselsFemaleHumansMalePredictive Value of TestsRisk Factorscomputed tomographycomputed tomography coronary angiographycoronary artery diseasequantitative plaque analysissex

Identifiers

PMID33865779
PMCPMC8435010
OpenAlexW3154392517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.