Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33865398›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2021

"This is my boy's health! Talk straight to me!" perspectives on accessible and culturally safe care among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients of clinical genetics services.

Philippa Dalach, Ravi Savarirayan, Gareth Baynam, Julie McGaughran, Emma Kowal, Libby Massey, Misty Jenkins, Yin Paradies, Margaret Kelaher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Health inequalities in precision medicine: A systematic review.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Skin health of Aboriginal children living in urban communities.The Australasian journal of dermatology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Philippa DalachCentre for Health Policy, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. philippa.dalach@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-8518-3341
Ravi SavarirayanVictorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute and University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Gareth BaynamWestern Australian Department of Health, Genetic Services of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Julie McGaughranGenetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Emma KowalAlfred Deakin Institute for Citizenship and Globalisation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Libby MasseyMachado Joseph Disease Foundation, Alyangula, Northern Territory, Australia.
Misty JenkinsWalter & Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Yin ParadiesAlfred Deakin Institute for Citizenship and Globalisation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Margaret KelaherCentre for Health Policy, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AUDeakin University · AUJames Cook University · AUThe Kids Research Institute Australia · AUThe University of Queensland · AUWalter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people do not enjoy equal access to specialist health services that adequately meet their needs. Clinical genetics services are at the vanguard of realising the health benefits of genomic medicine. As the field continues to expand in clinical utility and implementation, it is critical that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are able to participate and benefit equally to avoid further widening of the existing health gap. This is the first study to explore barriers to accessing clinical genetics services among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, which has been acknowledged as a key strategic priority in Australian genomic health policy.

methodsA participatory design process engaged a majority-Aboriginal Project Reference Group and Aboriginal End-User Group. 63 semi-structured interviews were conducted with Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people who had accessed the government-funded clinical genetics service in Western Australia, Queensland or the Northern Territory between 2014 and 2018. The sample included patients, parents and carers. Participants were asked to recount their 'patient journey', from referral through to post-appointment and reflect on their perceptions of genetics and its implications for the health of themselves and their families. Analysis tracked chronological service engagement, followed by an inductive thematic approach.

resultsBarriers to access and engagement were present at each stage of the patient journey. These included challenges in obtaining a referral, long waiting periods, limited genetic literacy, absence of Aboriginal support services, communication challenges and lack of adequate psychosocial support and follow-up after attendance. Participants' overall experiences of attending a genetic health service were varied, with positive perceptions tied closely to a diagnosis being achieved. The experience of (and expectation for) recognition of cultural identity and provision of culturally safe care was low among participants. Unaddressed concerns continued to cause significant distress in some people years after their appointment took place.

conclusionsThere is significant scope for improving the care provided to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people at clinical genetics services. Immediate attention to minimising logistical barriers, developing relationships with Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services and providing practical and specific cultural safety training for practitioners is required at the service-level. Our findings strongly support the development of guidelines or policies recognising the collective cultural needs of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in relation to genomic health care.

Indexed as

Culturally Competent CareHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services, IndigenousAustralian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesCultural CompetencyFemaleGenetic TestingHumansInterviews as TopicMaleNorthern TerritoryQualitative ResearchQueenslandWestern AustraliaAboriginal and Torres Strait islandersAccess to health careCultural safetyGenetic health servicesIndigenous Australians

Identifiers

PMID33865398
PMCPMC8052687
OpenAlexW3154012969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.