ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2021
"This is my boy's health! Talk straight to me!" perspectives on accessible and culturally safe care among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients of clinical genetics services.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Health inequalities in precision medicine: A systematic review.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Review
- Newborn Screening: Equity for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Families in the Context of Emerging Genomics.The Medical journal of Australia · 2026Article
- Scoping review of Australian prioritisation frameworks impacting consumer access to clinical genetics: protocol.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Achieving cultural safety in genetic counseling for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- The impact of genetics and the environment on cancer risk in Indigenous Australians: a narrative review.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025Review
- Skin health of Aboriginal children living in urban communities.The Australasian journal of dermatology · 2024Article
- Culturally safe and ethical biomarker and genomic research with Indigenous peoples-a scoping review.BMC global and public health · 2024Article
- Qualitative genomic research with Indigenous peoples: a scoping review of participatory practice.BMJ global health · 2024Article
- Aboriginal families living with MJD in remote Australia: questions of access and equity.International journal for equity in health · 2024Article
- Precision medicine in Australia: indigenous health professionals are needed to improve equity for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders.International journal for equity in health · 2024Article
- An Exploration of the Goodness of Fit of Web-Based Tools for Māori: Qualitative Study Using Interviews and Focus Groups.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Genetic counseling workforce diversity, inclusion, and capacity in Australia and New Zealand.Genetics in medicine open · 2024Article
- What matters to parents? A scoping review of parents' service experiences and needs regarding genetic testing for rare diseases.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2023Article
- Parental perceptions, attitudes, and beliefs regarding vaccination of children aged 0-5 years: A qualitative study of hill-tribe communities, Thailand.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023Article
- Supporting Indigenous health equity strategic planning: a Queensland perspective.The Medical journal of Australia · 2023Article
- Exploring self-determined solutions to service and system challenges to promote social and emotional wellbeing in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people: a qualitative study.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Investigating disparity in access to Australian clinical genetic health services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.Nature communications · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people do not enjoy equal access to specialist health services that adequately meet their needs. Clinical genetics services are at the vanguard of realising the health benefits of genomic medicine. As the field continues to expand in clinical utility and implementation, it is critical that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are able to participate and benefit equally to avoid further widening of the existing health gap. This is the first study to explore barriers to accessing clinical genetics services among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, which has been acknowledged as a key strategic priority in Australian genomic health policy.
methodsA participatory design process engaged a majority-Aboriginal Project Reference Group and Aboriginal End-User Group. 63 semi-structured interviews were conducted with Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people who had accessed the government-funded clinical genetics service in Western Australia, Queensland or the Northern Territory between 2014 and 2018. The sample included patients, parents and carers. Participants were asked to recount their 'patient journey', from referral through to post-appointment and reflect on their perceptions of genetics and its implications for the health of themselves and their families. Analysis tracked chronological service engagement, followed by an inductive thematic approach.
resultsBarriers to access and engagement were present at each stage of the patient journey. These included challenges in obtaining a referral, long waiting periods, limited genetic literacy, absence of Aboriginal support services, communication challenges and lack of adequate psychosocial support and follow-up after attendance. Participants' overall experiences of attending a genetic health service were varied, with positive perceptions tied closely to a diagnosis being achieved. The experience of (and expectation for) recognition of cultural identity and provision of culturally safe care was low among participants. Unaddressed concerns continued to cause significant distress in some people years after their appointment took place.
conclusionsThere is significant scope for improving the care provided to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people at clinical genetics services. Immediate attention to minimising logistical barriers, developing relationships with Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services and providing practical and specific cultural safety training for practitioners is required at the service-level. Our findings strongly support the development of guidelines or policies recognising the collective cultural needs of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in relation to genomic health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.