Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33865366›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2021

Development of a tailor-made surgical online learning platform, ensuring surgical education in times of the COVID19 pandemic.

Sophia M Schmitz, Sandra Schipper, Martin Lemos, Patrick H Alizai, Elda Kokott, Jonathan F Brozat, Ulf P Neumann, Tom F Ulmer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Use of Operative Video Technology in Surgical Education: A Systematic Review.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Sophia M Schmitz *Department for General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany. sopschmitz@ukaachen.de.
Sandra Schipper *Department for General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Martin LemosAudiovisual Media Center, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Patrick H AlizaiDepartment for General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Elda KokottDepartment for General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Jonathan F BrozatDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Ulf P NeumannDepartment for General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Tom F UlmerDepartment for General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
RWTH Aachen University · DEMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLTheranostics (New Zealand) · NZ

Funding

Stifterverband Personal Fellowship for Sophia M. Schmitz
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic, the quality of surgical education experiences sudden major restrictions. Students' presence in the operating theater and on wards is reduced to a bare minimum and face-to-face teaching is diminished. Aim of this study was therefore to evaluate alternative but feasible educational concepts, such as an online-only-platform for undergraduates.

objectiveA new online platform for undergraduate surgical education was implemented. A virtual curriculum for online-only education was designed.

methodsA video-based online platform was designed. Following this, a cohort of medical students participating in a (voluntary) surgical course was randomized into a test and control group. Prior to conducting a written exam, students in the test group prepared using the video platform. Students in the control group prepared with standard surgical text books. Results of the exam were used to compare educational means.

resultsStudents in the test group preparing through the video-based online platform reached significantly higher scores in the written exams (p = 0.0001) than students of the control group. A trend towards reduced preparation time that did not reach statistical significance was detectable in the test group (p = 0.090). Scores of "perceived workload" and "desire to become a surgeon" offered no differences between the groups. (p = 0.474 and 1.000).

conclusionsAn online-only, virtual curriculum proved feasible for surgical education in undergraduates. While blended learning concepts were applied in both groups, only the test group had access to case-based videos of surgical procedures and scored significantly better in the written exams. Thus, video-based virtual education offers a realistic alternative to face-to-face teaching or conventional text books in times of restricted access to the operating theatre.

Indexed as

Educational MeasurementEducation, DistanceCOVID-19General SurgeryHumansPandemicsVideo RecordingBlended learningCOVID 19Flipped classroomSurgical educationVirtual curriculum

Identifiers

PMID33865366
PMCPMC8052764
OpenAlexW3156440043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.