Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33865355›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2021

Retrospective analysis of pediatric patients with multiple rare-earth magnets ingestion: a single-center experience from China.

Yucan Zheng, Zhihua Zhang, Kunlong Yan, Hongmei Guo, Mei Li, Min Lian, Zhifeng Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Child with Closed Head Injury and Persistent Vomiting.Clinical practice and cases in emergency medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yucan ZhengDepartment of Gastroenterology, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210008, China.
Zhihua ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210008, China.
Kunlong YanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210008, China.
Hongmei GuoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210008, China.
Mei LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210008, China.
Min Lian *Department of Gastroenterology, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210008, China. 13337836374@163.com.
Zhifeng Liu *Department of Gastroenterology, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210008, China. zfliu@njmu.edu.cn.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to characterize patients who ingested multiple rare-earth magnets, reveal the harm of rare-earth magnet foreign bodies in the digestive tract, and develop a clinical management algorithm.

methodsThis was a retrospective review of patients with rare-earth magnet foreign bodies in the digestive tract admitted to a university-affiliated pediatric medical center in China, between January 2016 and December 2019; the subset of medical data evaluated included clinical symptoms, signs, treatments and outcomes.

resultsA total of 51 cases were included in this study, including 36(70.6%) males and 15(29.4%) females. The magnets were passed naturally in 24(47.1%) patients and removed by intervention in 27(52.9%) patients, including 5(9.8%) cases by endoscopy and 22(43.1%) cases by surgery. Twenty-two (43.1%)cases had gastrointestinal obstruction, perforation, and fistula. Compared with the non-surgical group, the time of the surgical group from ingestion to arriving at the hospital was longer([80(5-336) vs 26(2-216)]hours, p < 0.001) while there was no significant difference in the mean age or the number of magnets swallowed.

conclusionsMagnets are attractive to children, but lead to catastrophic consequences including gastrointestinal obstruction, perforation, and surgical interventions when ingested multiple magnets. Endoscopic resection should be urgently performed in the presence of multiple magnets as early as possible within 24 h, even in asymptomatic patients.

Indexed as

Foreign BodiesMagnetsChildChinaEatingFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesChildrenForeign bodyMultiple magnets ingestionPerforation

Identifiers

PMID33865355
PMCPMC8052718
OpenAlexW3155328657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.