Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33865317›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2021

Utilizing machine learning dimensionality reduction for risk stratification of chest pain patients in the emergency department.

Nan Liu, Marcel Lucas Chee, Zhi Xiong Koh, Su Li Leow, Andrew Fu Wah Ho, Dagang Guo, Marcus Eng Hock Ong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. QTc interval prolongation impact on in-hospital mortality in acute coronary syndromes patients using artificial intelligence and machine learning.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Prognostic Value of Machine Learning in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nan LiuDuke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. liu.nan@duke-nus.edu.sg.ORCID 0000-0003-3610-4883
Marcel Lucas CheeFaculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Zhi Xiong KohDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Su Li LeowDuke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Andrew Fu Wah HoDuke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Dagang GuoSingHealth Duke-NUS Emergency Medicine Academic Clinical Programme, Singapore, Singapore.
Marcus Eng Hock OngDuke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChest pain is among the most common presenting complaints in the emergency department (ED). Swift and accurate risk stratification of chest pain patients in the ED may improve patient outcomes and reduce unnecessary costs. Traditional logistic regression with stepwise variable selection has been used to build risk prediction models for ED chest pain patients. In this study, we aimed to investigate if machine learning dimensionality reduction methods can improve performance in deriving risk stratification models.

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of patients > 20 years old who presented to the ED of Singapore General Hospital with chest pain between September 2010 and July 2015. Variables used included demographics, medical history, laboratory findings, heart rate variability (HRV), and heart rate n-variability (HRnV) parameters calculated from five to six-minute electrocardiograms (ECGs). The primary outcome was 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE), which included death, acute myocardial infarction, and revascularization within 30 days of ED presentation. We used eight machine learning dimensionality reduction methods and logistic regression to create different prediction models. We further excluded cardiac troponin from candidate variables and derived a separate set of models to evaluate the performance of models without using laboratory tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and calibration analysis was used to compare model performance.

resultsSeven hundred ninety-five patients were included in the analysis, of which 247 (31%) met the primary outcome of 30-day MACE. Patients with MACE were older and more likely to be male. All eight dimensionality reduction methods achieved comparable performance with the traditional stepwise variable selection; The multidimensional scaling algorithm performed the best with an area under the curve of 0.901. All prediction models generated in this study outperformed several existing clinical scores in ROC analysis.

conclusionsDimensionality reduction models showed marginal value in improving the prediction of 30-day MACE for ED chest pain patients. Moreover, they are black box models, making them difficult to explain and interpret in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Chest PainEmergency Service, HospitalAdultFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSingaporeYoung AdultChest painDimensionality reductionEmergency departmentHeart rate n-variability (HRnV)Heart rate variability (HRV)Machine learning

Identifiers

PMID33865317
PMCPMC8052947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.