Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33865192›Full record

ReviewESMO open2021

Combining immunotherapy with an epidrug in squamous cell carcinomas of different locations: rationale and design of the PEVO basket trial.

E de Guillebon, M Jimenez, L Mazzarella, F Betsou, P Stadler, I Peták, E Jeannot, L Chanas, N Servant, G Marret and 24 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ESMO open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. HPV-Independent Cervical Cancer-A New Challenge of Modern Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Role of epigenetics in OSCC: an understanding above genetics.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Circulating HPV DNA as a Marker for Early Detection of Relapse in Patients with Cervical Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

E de GuillebonDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris, France; Inserm U932 Research Unit - Immunite et cancer, Paris, France.
M JimenezUnicancer, Paris, France.
L MazzarellaDepartment of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology - IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Division of Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology - IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
F BetsouIntegrated Biobank of Luxembourg, Dudelange, Luxembourg.
P StadlerBioinformatics Group, Department of Computer, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
I PetákOncompass Medicine Ltd, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, USA.
E JeannotDepartment of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France; Department of Pathology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
L ChanasData Direction, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
N ServantInserm U900 Research Unit, Saint Cloud, France.
G MarretDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris, France.
B A DusoDepartment of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology - IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
F LegrandUnicancer, Paris, France.
K N KornerupIntegrated Biobank of Luxembourg, Dudelange, Luxembourg.
S H BernhartBioinformatics Group, Department of Computer, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
G BaloghBioinformatics Group, Department of Computer, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
R DócziOncompass Medicine Ltd, Budapest, Hungary.
P FilotásOncompass Medicine Ltd, Budapest, Hungary.
G CuriglianoDivision of Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology - IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; University of Milano, Milan, Italy.
I BiècheDepartment of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
J GuérinData Direction, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
A DirnerOncompass Medicine Ltd, Budapest, Hungary.
C NeuzilletDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France; Paris-Saclay University, Paris, France.
N GirardDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France; Paris-Saclay University, Paris, France.
E BorcomanDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris, France.
L Larbi ChérifDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris, France.
P TrescaDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris, France.
D B RoufaiDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris, France.
C DupainDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris, France.
S SchollDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris, France.
F AndréDepartment of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; INSERM, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, UMR981, Villejuif; University of Paris-Sud, Orsay, France.
X FernandezData Direction, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
T FilleronBiostatistics Unit, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
M KamalDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris, France. Electronic address: maud.kamal@curie.fr.
C Le TourneauDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris, France; Inserm U900 Research Unit, Saint Cloud, France; Paris-Saclay University, Paris, France. Electronic address: Christophe.letourneau@curie.fr.
Institut Curie · FRInserm · FRLeipzig University · DECentral Bank of Luxembourg · LUEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITSemmelweis University · HUUniCancer Group · FRUniversité Paris-Saclay · FRInstitut Claudius Regaud · FRUniversité Paris-Sud · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) are among the most frequent solid tumors in humans. SCCs, related or not to the human papillomavirus, share common molecular features. Immunotherapies, and specifically immune checkpoint inhibitors, have been shown to improve overall survival in multiple cancer types, including SCCs. However, only a minority of patients experience a durable response with immunotherapy. Epigenetic modulation plays a major role in escaping tumor immunosurveillance and confers resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Preclinical evidence suggests that modulating the epigenome might improve the efficacy of immunotherapy. We herein review the preclinical and the clinical rationale for combining immunotherapy with an epidrug, and detail the design of PEVOsq, a basket clinical trial combining pembrolizumab with vorinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, in patients with SCCs of different locations. Sequential blood and tumor sampling will be collected in order to identify predictive and pharmacodynamics biomarkers of efficacy of the combination. We also present how clinical and biological data will be managed with the aim to enable the development of a prospective integrative platform to allow secure and controlled access to the project data as well as further exploitations.

Indexed as

AlphapapillomavirusCarcinoma, Squamous CellHumansImmunotherapyPapillomaviridaeProspective StudiesepigeneticsHPVimmunotherapyprecision medicine clinical trialsquamous cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID33865192
PMCPMC8066350
OpenAlexW3156762558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.