Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33865169›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychiatric research2021

Perceived protectiveness of research safeguards and influences on willingness to participate in research: A novel MTurk pilot study.

Jane Paik Kim, Katie Ryan, Tenzin Tsungmey, Max Kasun, Willa A Roberts, Laura B Dunn, Laura Weiss Roberts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychiatric research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Increasing participation of people with thought disorder in clinical research.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jane Paik KimDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1520 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA. Electronic address: janepkim@stanford.edu.
Katie RyanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1520 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
Tenzin TsungmeyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1520 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
Max KasunDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1520 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
Willa A RobertsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 401 Quarry Road, Stanford, CA, 94305-5717, USA.
Laura B DunnDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 401 Quarry Road, Stanford, CA, 94305-5717, USA.
Laura Weiss RobertsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 401 Quarry Road, Stanford, CA, 94305-5717, USA.

Funding

Enabling ethical participation in innovative neuroscience on mental illness and addiction: towards a new screening tool enhancing informed consent for transformative research on the human brainR01MH114856 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ROBERTS, LAURA W · 2017 to 2020
$2.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH114856
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about how individuals with mood disorders view the protectiveness of research safeguards, and whether their views affect their willingness to participate in psychiatric research. We conducted an online survey with 80 individuals (self-reported mood disorder [n = 25], self-reported good health [n = 55]) recruited via MTurk. We assessed respondents' perceptions of the protectiveness of five common research safeguards, as well as their willingness to participate in research that incorporates each safeguard. Perceived protectiveness was strongly related to willingness to participate in research for four of the safeguards. Our findings add to a limited literature on the motivations and perspectives of key stakeholders in psychiatric research.

Indexed as

Mood DisordersMotivationHumansPilot ProjectsSurveys and QuestionnairesMood disordersPerspectivesResearch participationResearch safeguardsWillingness

Identifiers

PMID33865169
PMCPMC8513533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.