Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33864979›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of medical informatics2021

Data gaps in electronic health record (EHR) systems: An audit of problem list completeness during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Jordan Poulos, Leilei Zhu, Anoop D Shah

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of medical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Which Electronic Health Record System Should We Use? A Systematic Review.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jordan PoulosUCL Medical School, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK; EHRS Directorate, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 250 Euston Rd, London, NW1 2PG, UK.
Leilei ZhuEHRS Directorate, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 250 Euston Rd, London, NW1 2PG, UK; Clinical and Research Informatics Unit, UCL/UCLH NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, UCL Institute of Health Informatics, 222 Euston Road, London, NW1 2DA, UK.
Anoop D ShahClinical and Research Informatics Unit, UCL/UCLH NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, UCL Institute of Health Informatics, 222 Euston Road, London, NW1 2DA, UK. Electronic address: anoop@doctors.org.uk.
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUCL Biomedical Research Centre · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the completeness of diagnosis recording in problem lists in a hospital electronic health record (EHR) system during the COVID-19 pandemic.

designRetrospective chart review with manual review of free text electronic case notes.

settingMajor teaching hospital trust in London, one year after the launch of a comprehensive EHR system (Epic), during the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK.

participants516 patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19.

main outcome measuresPercentage of diagnoses already included in the structured problem list.

resultsPrior to review, these patients had a combined total of 2841 diagnoses recorded in their EHR problem lists. 1722 additional diagnoses were identified, increasing the mean number of recorded problems per patient from 5.51 to 8.84. The overall percentage of diagnoses originally included in the problem list was 62.3% (2841 / 4563, 95% confidence interval 60.8%, 63.7%).

conclusionsDiagnoses and other clinical information stored in a structured way in electronic health records is extremely useful for supporting clinical decisions, improving patient care and enabling better research. However, recording of medical diagnoses on the structured problem list for inpatients is incomplete, with almost 40% of important diagnoses mentioned only in the free text notes.

Indexed as

COVID-19Electronic Health RecordsHumansPandemicsRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2COVID-19Data completenessEHR systemsElectronic health recordHealth information technologyProblem lists

Identifiers

PMID33864979
PMCPMC9759969
OpenAlexW3141554602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.