Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33864787›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2021

Transition from growth to decay of an epidemic due to lockdown.

Hamid Khataee, Jack Kibble, Istvan Scheuring, Andras Czirok, Zoltan Neufeld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hamid KhataeeSchool of Mathematics and Physics, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. Electronic address: h.khataee@uq.edu.au.
Jack KibbleSchool of Mathematics and Physics, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Istvan ScheuringEvolutionary Systems Research Group, Centre for Ecological Research, Budapest, Hungary; MTA-ELTE Theoretical Biology and Evolutionary Ecology Research Group, Eotvos University, Budapest, Hungary.
Andras CzirokDepartment of Biological Physics, Eotvos University, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Zoltan NeufeldSchool of Mathematics and Physics, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We study the transition of an epidemic from growth phase to decay of the active infections in a population when lockdown health measures are introduced to reduce the probability of disease transmission. Although in the case of uniform lockdown, a simple compartmental model would indicate instantaneous transition to decay of the epidemic, this is not the case when partially isolated active clusters remain with the potential to create a series of small outbreaks. We model this using the Gillespie stochastic simulation algorithm based on a connected set of stochastic susceptible-infected-removed/recovered networks representing the locked-down majority population (in which the reproduction number is less than 1) weakly coupled to a large set of small clusters in which the infection may propagate. We find that the presence of such active clusters can lead to slower than expected decay of the epidemic and significantly delayed onset of the decay phase. We study the relative contributions of these changes, caused by the active clusters within the population, to the additional total infected population. We also demonstrate that limiting the size of the inevitable active clusters can be efficient in reducing their impact on the overall size of the epidemic outbreak. The deceleration of the decay phase becomes apparent when the active clusters form at least 5% of the population.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksEpidemicsAlgorithmsComputer SimulationHumansProbability

Identifiers

PMID33864787
PMCPMC8390909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.