Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33864738›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Public health2021

Global estimates of expected and preventable cervical cancers among girls born between 2005 and 2014: a birth cohort analysis.

Maxime Bonjour, Hadrien Charvat, Eduardo L Franco, Marion Piñeros, Gary M Clifford, Freddie Bray, Iacopo Baussano

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cancer of the cervix uteri: 2025 update.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Viral oncogenesis in cancer: from mechanisms to therapeutics.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maxime BonjourEarly Detection, Prevention and Infections Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France; Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Hadrien CharvatCancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France.
Eduardo L FrancoDivision of Cancer Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Marion PiñerosCancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France.
Gary M CliffordEarly Detection, Prevention and Infections Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France.
Freddie BrayCancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France.
Iacopo BaussanoEarly Detection, Prevention and Infections Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France. Electronic address: baussanoi@iarc.fr.
Centre International de Recherche sur le Cancer · FRMcGill University · CA

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWHO has launched an initiative aiming to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health problem. Elimination is a long-term target that needs long-lasting commitment. To support local authorities in implementing human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination, we provide regional and country-specific estimates of cervical cancer burden and the projected impact of HPV vaccination among today's young girls who could develop cervical cancer if not vaccinated.

methodsThe expected number of cervical cancer cases in the absence of vaccination among girls born between 2005 and 2014 was quantified by combining age-specific incidence rates from GLOBOCAN 2018 and cohort-specific mortality rates by age from UN demographic projections. Preventable cancers were estimated on the basis of HPV prevalence reduction attributable to vaccination and the relative contribution of each HPV type to cervical cancer incidence. We assessed the number of cervical cancer cases preventable through vaccines targeting HPV types 16 and 18, with and without cross-protection, and through vaccines targeting HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58.

findingsGlobally, without vaccination, the burden of cervical cancer in these birth cohorts is expected to reach 11·6 million (95% uncertainty interval 11·4-12·0) cases by 2094. Approximately 75% of the burden will be concentrated in 25 countries mostly located in Africa and Asia, where the future number of cases is expected to increase manyfold, reaching 5·6 million (5·4-6·0) cases in Africa and 4·5 million (4·4-4·6) cases in Asia. Worldwide immunisation with an HPV vaccine targeted to HPV types 16 and 18, with cross-protection against HPV types 31, 33, and 45, could prevent about 8·7 million (8·5-9·0) cases.

interpretationDetailed estimates of the increasing burden of cervical cancer and projected impact of HPV vaccination is of immediate relevance to public health decision makers. Shifting the focus of projections towards recently born girls who could develop cervical cancer if not vaccinated is fundamental to overcome stakeholders' hesitancy towards HPV vaccination.

fundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Indexed as

FemaleGlobal Burden of DiseaseGlobal HealthHumansMass VaccinationPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsPapillomavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID33864738
PMCPMC8225515
OpenAlexW3155324950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.