ArticleInternational ophthalmology2021
Amniotic membrane extract eye drops for ocular surface diseases: use and clinical outcome in real-world practice.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- A bioactivity-enhanced thermosensitive amnion-derived hydrogel with sustained IGF-1 release: A multitargeted and efficient strategy for corneal injury repair.Bioactive materials · 2027Article
- Determinants of extraction efficiency in human amniotic membrane processing: biological, mechanical, and biochemical factors shaping growth factor yield.Cell and tissue banking · 2026Review
- Lyophilized Amniotic Membrane Eye Drops Stabilize the Tear Film in Dry Eye Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Current and Emerging Approaches in the Management of Severe Ocular Surface Disease.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Amniotic membrane extract provides significant improvement in in vitro wound healing model while preserving the basic cellular functions of human corneal epithelial cells.Cell and tissue banking · 2025Article
- Current and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies for the Management of Neurotrophic Keratitis.Drugs · 2025Review
- Commercial amniotic membrane extract eye drops for canine SCCED: a retrospective clinical evaluation.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Clinically correlated dose of the amniotic membrane extract is superior to its transplantation in corneal wound healing.Molecular vision · 2024Article
- Treatment of Dry Eye Disease (DED) in Asia: Strategies for Short Tear Film Breakup Time-Type DED.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Article
- Preparation of human amniotic membrane for transplantation in different application areas.Frontiers in transplantation · 2023Review
- Dry eye disease: A review of anti-inflammatory therapies.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
- Beyond transplants: current and future therapeutic potential of amniotic membrane extract (AME) in ophthalmology.Regenerative medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo study the indications and clinical outcomes, in a real-word setting, of amniotic membrane extract eye drops (AMEED) use for ocular surface disease (OSD).
methodsA retrospective study of patients treated with topical AMEED between January 2018 and January 2020 was conducted. Patients were classified in two groups according to specific OSD-dry eye disease (DED) and wound healing delay (WHD) groups. Demographics, comorbidities, treatment duration and clinical outcomes were analysed.
resultsA total of 50 eyes of 36 patients with or without previous treatments were included. Patients in the DED group presented more systemic comorbidities (83 vs 22%; p < 0.001) and spent more mean time under AMEED treatment (10 vs 7.2 months average) than the WHD group (p = 0.0104). In four patients, long-term treatment (more than 24 months) was reported. Global similar symptomatic improvement was reported for both groups (DED 88.9% vs WHD 100%; p = 0.486), with the WHD group especially consisting in general relief (78%) and the DED group reporting more pain improvement (44%) (p = 0.011). Regarding patients with autologous serum as a previous treatment, no statistical differences were found in subjective or objective improvement. An overall success was achieved in 94.4% of the cases and no adverse events were found.
conclusionAMEED administration is a promising mean to treat OSD such as dry eye, persistent epithelial defect and corneal ulcers. Although AMEED may be effective in the treatment of severe DED and persistent epithelial defect or corneal ulcers, conclusions are limited owing to the absence of controlled clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33864578What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.